Paul Jubb vs Hernan Casanova — Santiago CH Round of 32

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1338Clay ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
clay
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Jubb P.
6-1 2-6 6-2
Casanova H.
Jubb P.
6262
Casanova H.
1621

Paul Jubb defeated Hernan Casanova 6-1 2-6 6-2 in the Santiago CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Paul Jubb closed it out in three sets, 6–1 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Casanova H.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Casanova H.
1st serve in·Clear edge
61%
76%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
0.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 155). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jubb P.Casanova H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
37
8
Break points saved·Dominant
84
24
Break points won·Clear edge
6
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
44
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Casanova H.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Clay Elo 1338
Surface ELO
5.6+43 Clay Elo edge
5.3Overall Elo 1426
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1393
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Casanova H.
Freshness·Dominant
100
65

Jubb P.: 19 days rest · Casanova H.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Dellien H.[3]
Tabilo A.[2]
6-34-66-4
Semi-finals
Dellien H.[3]
Etcheverry T.[5]
6-36-736-4
Tabilo A.[2]
Varillas J.[4]
7-666-1
Quarter-finals
Tabilo A.[2]
Kopriva V.
6-24-66-3
Varillas J.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
7-56-2
Dellien H.[3]
De Jong J.
6-36-3
Etcheverry T.[5]
Lehecka J.[1]
6-46-3
R16
Kopriva V.
Kicker N.
6-44-67-5
Dellien H.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Etcheverry T.[5]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-14-67-5
Tabilo A.[2]
Lama G.
6-16-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Londero J.[6]
6-756-27-5
Lehecka J.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-33-66-3
Varillas J.[4]
Torres J.
6-16-3
De Jong J.
Jubb P.
7-56-3
R32
Tabilo A.[2]
Nunez D.
7-56-0
Lama G.
Juarez F.
6-26-746-1
Kicker N.
Mena F.
6-36-4
Kopriva V.
Jarry N.[7]
1-67-636-3
Torres J.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Olivieri G.
6-33-66-3
Londero J.[6]
Collarini A.
6-07-65
Jubb P.
Casanova H.
6-12-66-2
Olivo R.
Becerra Otarola I.
6-26-0
Dellien H.[3]
Cachin P.
2-67-646-1
Etcheverry T.[5]
Furness E.
7-56-2
Oliveira G.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-26-1
Lehecka J.[1]
Martineau M.
6-36-2
De Jong J.
Barrios Vera T.[8]
6-17-60
Ugo Carabelli C.
Fernandez Flores D.
6-36-1
Varillas J.[4]
Tirante T.
6-46-3