Christopher Oconnell vs Kevin Anderson — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
AUS
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
hard
RSA4
Kevin Anderson
40 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Oconnell C.
3-6 6-2 6-2
Anderson K.
Oconnell C.
3662
Anderson K.
6221

Christopher Oconnell defeated Kevin Anderson 3-6 6-2 6-2 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kevin Anderson came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Anderson K.

Anderson K.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Anderson K.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Anderson K.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
68%
Return points won·Even
35%
31%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
68%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
13.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 17). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Anderson K.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
63
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Clear edge
22
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
38
83
Tiebreaks·Even
93
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oconnell C.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Anderson K.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
3.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
7.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Country comfort
5.9
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 10%
Q2
Daniel T.[12]
Masur D.
6-46-2
Rune H.[3]
Kozlov S.[15]
6-46-2
Wolf J.
Galan D.[11]
7-636-2
Broady L.[17]
Oconnell C.
7-676-0
Kukushkin M.
Nishioka Y.[6]
6-27-64
Eubanks C.
Sousa J.[2]
7-647-64
Kohlschreiber P.[22]
Kudla D.[10]
0-66-36-3
Munar J.[8]
Vukic A.[18]
6-36-2
Sandgren T.
Millman J.[1]
6-737-687-65
Shang J.
Moraing M.[19]
6-30-0
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Pospisil V.[20]
7-657-5
Machac T.
Marchenko I.
5-76-36-3
Q1
Nishioka Y.[6]
Grenier H.
6-13-66-4
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-4
Vukic A.[18]
Caruso S.
6-26-2
Sandgren T.
Fratangelo B.[24]
4-66-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Seppi A.[16]
6-26-4
Millman J.[1]
Holt B.
6-46-0
Munar J.[8]
Kuzuhara B.
6-16-4
Shang J.
Cerundolo F.[9]
7-646-4
Pospisil V.[20]
Gerasimov E.
4-66-46-4
Oconnell C.
Anderson K.[4]
3-66-26-2
Eubanks C.
Lopez F.[13]
4-66-37-5
Sousa J.[2]
Purcell M.
5-77-657-64
Kohlschreiber P.[22]
Bolt A.
2-66-46-4
Broady L.[17]
Ramanathan R.
6-23-66-4
Rune H.[3]
Krueger M.
6-43-66-3
Daniel T.[12]
Nava E.
7-57-5
Kudla D.[10]
Tseng C.
6-16-4
Galan D.[11]
Popko D.
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Gomez E.[23]
6-16-3
Masur D.
Ymer E.[21]
6-47-5
Kozlov S.[15]
Sec S.
6-36-746-2
Machac T.
Albot R.[14]
6-47-5
Moraing M.[19]
Maden Y.
5-4
Marchenko I.
Cecchinato M.[5]
6-16-2