Tomas Machac vs Radu Albot — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 March 2022
hard
Radu Albot
MDA14
Radu Albot
#440ATP
1453ELO
1429Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
Machac T.
6-4 7-5
Albot R.
Machac T.
672
Albot R.
450

Tomas Machac defeated Radu Albot 6-4 7-5 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #49.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Albot R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Albot R.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Albot R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Albot R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
85
Break points won·Dominant
80
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Albot R.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+401 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1429
10.0Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1453
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
5.1
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Country comfort
5.4
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Machac T.Albot R.
Freshness·
—
88

Albot R.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 10%
Q2
Daniel T.[12]
Masur D.
6-46-2
Rune H.[3]
Kozlov S.[15]
6-46-2
Wolf J.
Galan D.[11]
7-636-2
Broady L.[17]
Oconnell C.
7-676-0
Kukushkin M.
Nishioka Y.[6]
6-27-64
Eubanks C.
Sousa J.[2]
7-647-64
Kohlschreiber P.[22]
Kudla D.[10]
0-66-36-3
Munar J.[8]
Vukic A.[18]
6-36-2
Sandgren T.
Millman J.[1]
6-737-687-65
Shang J.
Moraing M.[19]
6-30-0
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Pospisil V.[20]
7-657-5
Machac T.
Marchenko I.
5-76-36-3
Q1
Nishioka Y.[6]
Grenier H.
6-13-66-4
Kokkinakis T.[7]
Fabbiano T.
6-36-4
Vukic A.[18]
Caruso S.
6-26-2
Sandgren T.
Fratangelo B.[24]
4-66-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Seppi A.[16]
6-26-4
Millman J.[1]
Holt B.
6-46-0
Munar J.[8]
Kuzuhara B.
6-16-4
Shang J.
Cerundolo F.[9]
7-646-4
Pospisil V.[20]
Gerasimov E.
4-66-46-4
Oconnell C.
Anderson K.[4]
3-66-26-2
Eubanks C.
Lopez F.[13]
4-66-37-5
Sousa J.[2]
Purcell M.
5-77-657-64
Kohlschreiber P.[22]
Bolt A.
2-66-46-4
Broady L.[17]
Ramanathan R.
6-23-66-4
Rune H.[3]
Krueger M.
6-43-66-3
Daniel T.[12]
Nava E.
7-57-5
Kudla D.[10]
Tseng C.
6-16-4
Galan D.[11]
Popko D.
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Gomez E.[23]
6-16-3
Masur D.
Ymer E.[21]
6-47-5
Kozlov S.[15]
Sec S.
6-36-746-2
Machac T.
Albot R.[14]
6-47-5
Moraing M.[19]
Maden Y.
5-4
Marchenko I.
Cecchinato M.[5]
6-16-2