Mats Moraing vs Vasek Pospisil — Turin CH Semi-final

Turin CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
GER2
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
clay
CAN3
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Moraing M.
6-4 6-4
Pospisil V.
Moraing M.
662
Pospisil V.
440

Mats Moraing defeated Vasek Pospisil 6-4 6-4 in the Turin CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Mats Moraing edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Moraing M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Pospisil V.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Serve advantage — Pospisil V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Moraing M.Pospisil V.
1st serve in·Even
57%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.0
9.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moraing M.Pospisil V.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
40
49
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
96
Break points won·Slight edge
18
7
Deciding sets·Even
66
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Moraing M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pospisil V.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
1.1
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
5.4
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[2]
Halys Q.[1]
7-6116-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[1]
Sels J.
4-67-637-60
Moraing M.[2]
Pospisil V.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Sels J.
Mmoh M.
7-677-5
Halys Q.[1]
Masur D.[6]
7-56-1
Moraing M.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[3]
Escoffier A.
7-646-4
R16
Moraing M.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
6-747-636-2
Sels J.
Fabbiano T.[5]
4-66-36-4
Mmoh M.
Agamenone F.[4]
6-26-4
Halys Q.[1]
Fils A.
6-757-656-4
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Pospisil V.[3]
Blanch U.
6-33-66-3
Masur D.[6]
Zeppieri G.
7-57-5
R32
Fils A.
Viola M.
3-67-646-2
Moraing M.[2]
Guinard M.
6-42-66-4
Brouwer G.
Ficovich J.
7-56-2
Jianu F.
Nardi L.
6-27-63
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
Kamke T.
6-36-1
Pospisil V.[3]
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Blanch U.
Eysseric J.
6-46-1
Escoffier A.
Lenz J.
6-07-66
Peniston R.
Marterer M.[8]
7-687-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Bemelmans R.
5-76-37-65
Mmoh M.
Zhang Z.
6-16-2
Agamenone F.[4]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Masur D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Zeppieri G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-726-26-4
Sels J.
Potenza L.
6-16-4
Halys Q.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-37-65