Xin Yu Wang vs Ann Li — Monterrey Round of 32

Monterrey · WTA · Round of 32
CHN
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1716Hard ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
hard
Ann Li
USA8
Ann Li
#29WTA
1807ELO
1746Hard ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
Wang X.
6-2 6-1
Li A.
Wang X.
662
Li A.
210

Xin Yu Wang defeated Ann Li 6-2 6-1 in the Monterrey round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ann Li came in defending last year's semi-final. Xin Yu Wang extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-17ClevelandSFhardAnn Li6-3 5-7 6-4
2022-01-17Australian OpenR128hardXin Yu Wang7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Li A.

Li A.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wang X.Li A.
25
Serve
47
40
Return
49

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Li A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 175). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang X.Li A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
60
76
Break points saved·Even
86
83
Break points won·Slight edge
78
87
Deciding sets·Even
86
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Li A.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.7Hard Elo 1716
Surface ELO
5.3+30 Hard Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1760
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1807
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.8
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
8.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wang X.Li A.
Freshness·
—
97

Li A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
15°COvercast
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 50%

Draw

Final
Fernandez L.[2]
Osorio C.[5]
6-756-47-63
Semi-finals
Osorio C.[5]
Parrizas Diaz N.[6]
6-46-4
Fernandez L.[2]
Haddad Maia B.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Haddad Maia B.
Bouzkova M.
4-66-47-67
Fernandez L.[2]
Wang Q.
7-646-4
Osorio C.[5]
Svitolina E.[1]
1-67-57-65
Parrizas Diaz N.[6]
Sorribes Tormo S.[4]
6-31-66-4
R16
Haddad Maia B.
Wang X.
6-26-2
Sorribes Tormo S.[4]
Tan H.
6-26-2
Wang Q.
Sherif M.
6-06-726-3
Osorio C.[5]
Zacarias M.
7-626-3
Bouzkova M.
Martic P.
6-46-2
Svitolina E.[1]
Tomova V.
7-633-66-2
Parrizas Diaz N.[6]
Watson H.
6-47-62
Fernandez L.[2]
Zheng Q.
6-14-67-63
R32
Osorio C.[5]
Frech M.
6-37-66
Sorribes Tormo S.[4]
Rakhimova K.
7-56-726-1
Watson H.
Niemeier J.
6-32-67-64
Parrizas Diaz N.[6]
Doi M.
6-26-1
Martic P.
Keys M.[3]
5-77-636-3
Svitolina E.[1]
Potapova A.
6-26-1
Tomova V.
Parry D.
6-46-0
Tan H.
Zarazua R.
6-01-0
Zheng Q.
Bronzetti L.
6-26-3
Fernandez L.[2]
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-2
Zacarias M.
Navarro E.
6-16-736-3
Wang Q.
Galfi D.
6-706-16-4
Sherif M.
Mendez S.
6-16-726-4
Wang X.
Li A.[8]
6-26-1
Haddad Maia B.
Udvardy P.
1-66-17-5
Bouzkova M.
Errani S.
4-66-26-4