Lukas Rosol vs Alessandro Giannessi — Las Palmas CH Round of 32

Las Palmas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
clay
ITA5
Alessandro Giannessi
36 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
Rosol L.
7-6 3-6 7-6
Giannessi A.
Rosol L.
793772
Giannessi A.
676621

Lukas Rosol defeated Alessandro Giannessi 7-6 3-6 7-6 in the Las Palmas CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Giannessi A.

Giannessi A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Serve advantage — Rosol L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Giannessi A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Giannessi A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
76
Break points won·Clear edge
3
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosol L.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Giannessi A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mager G.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mager G.[2]
Bonadio R.
6-27-65
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Ajdukovic D.
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Mager G.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-26-1
Bonadio R.
Moreno De Alboran N.
3-66-36-2
Ajdukovic D.
Caruso S.[4]
7-641-66-4
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Nikles J.
6-16-3
R16
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Martin Tiffon P.
7-656-1
Mager G.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-24-66-3
Brancaccio R.
Esteve Lobato E.
7-626-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Rosol L.
3-66-16-4
Nikles J.
Oliveira G.
5-77-57-5
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-56-1
Bonadio R.
Martin A.[3]
7-667-5
Caruso S.[4]
Gimeno Valero C.
6-36-4
R32
Barranco Cosano J.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-4
Esteve Lobato E.
Domingues J.
6-746-27-62
Brancaccio R.
Moroni G.[6]
6-06-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-06-2
Rosol L.
Giannessi A.[5]
7-673-67-62
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Giustino L.[8]
6-26-2
Gimeno Valero C.
Skatov T.
6-26-1
Caruso S.[4]
Lopez Montagud C.
5-76-06-4
Nikles J.
Gaio F.[7]
2-67-666-3
Oliveira G.
Bourgue M.
6-46-1
Martin Tiffon P.
Zekic M.
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Darderi L.
6-26-4
Ajdukovic D.
Damas M.
6-46-0
Bonadio R.
Perchicot M.
6-16-2
Mager G.[2]
Toledo Bague P.
6-46-2
Martin A.[3]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-16-1