Johan Nikles vs Federico Gaio — Las Palmas CH Round of 32

Las Palmas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#411ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
clay
ITA7
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Nikles J.
2-6 7-6 6-3
Gaio F.
Nikles J.
27862
Gaio F.
66631

Johan Nikles defeated Federico Gaio 2-6 7-6 6-3 in the Las Palmas CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nikles J.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nikles J.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
59%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.1
4.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (74 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nikles J.Gaio F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
7
20
Break points saved·Dominant
22
76
Break points won·Dominant
30
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
29
40
Tiebreaks·
—
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nikles J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gaio F.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
5.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mager G.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mager G.[2]
Bonadio R.
6-27-65
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Ajdukovic D.
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Mager G.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-26-1
Bonadio R.
Moreno De Alboran N.
3-66-36-2
Ajdukovic D.
Caruso S.[4]
7-641-66-4
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Nikles J.
6-16-3
R16
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Martin Tiffon P.
7-656-1
Mager G.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-24-66-3
Brancaccio R.
Esteve Lobato E.
7-626-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Rosol L.
3-66-16-4
Nikles J.
Oliveira G.
5-77-57-5
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-56-1
Bonadio R.
Martin A.[3]
7-667-5
Caruso S.[4]
Gimeno Valero C.
6-36-4
R32
Barranco Cosano J.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-4
Esteve Lobato E.
Domingues J.
6-746-27-62
Brancaccio R.
Moroni G.[6]
6-06-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-06-2
Rosol L.
Giannessi A.[5]
7-673-67-62
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Giustino L.[8]
6-26-2
Gimeno Valero C.
Skatov T.
6-26-1
Caruso S.[4]
Lopez Montagud C.
5-76-06-4
Nikles J.
Gaio F.[7]
2-67-666-3
Oliveira G.
Bourgue M.
6-46-1
Martin Tiffon P.
Zekic M.
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Darderi L.
6-26-4
Ajdukovic D.
Damas M.
6-46-0
Bonadio R.
Perchicot M.
6-16-2
Mager G.[2]
Toledo Bague P.
6-46-2
Martin A.[3]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-16-1