Antoine Escoffier vs Ryan Peniston — Turin CH Round of 16

Turin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1258Clay ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
clay
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1357Clay ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Escoffier A.
7-5 6-2
Peniston R.
Escoffier A.
762
Peniston R.
520

Antoine Escoffier defeated Ryan Peniston 7-5 6-2 in the Turin CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
20
Break points saved·Slight edge
68
60
Break points won·Slight edge
18
25
Deciding sets·Clear edge
12
36
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
3
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Peniston R.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.8Clay Elo 1258
Surface ELO
6.2+98 Clay Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1436
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1441
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
6.7
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[2]
Halys Q.[1]
7-6116-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[1]
Sels J.
4-67-637-60
Moraing M.[2]
Pospisil V.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Sels J.
Mmoh M.
7-677-5
Halys Q.[1]
Masur D.[6]
7-56-1
Moraing M.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[3]
Escoffier A.
7-646-4
R16
Moraing M.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
6-747-636-2
Sels J.
Fabbiano T.[5]
4-66-36-4
Mmoh M.
Agamenone F.[4]
6-26-4
Halys Q.[1]
Fils A.
6-757-656-4
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Pospisil V.[3]
Blanch U.
6-33-66-3
Masur D.[6]
Zeppieri G.
7-57-5
R32
Fils A.
Viola M.
3-67-646-2
Moraing M.[2]
Guinard M.
6-42-66-4
Brouwer G.
Ficovich J.
7-56-2
Jianu F.
Nardi L.
6-27-63
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
Kamke T.
6-36-1
Pospisil V.[3]
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Blanch U.
Eysseric J.
6-46-1
Escoffier A.
Lenz J.
6-07-66
Peniston R.
Marterer M.[8]
7-687-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Bemelmans R.
5-76-37-65
Mmoh M.
Zhang Z.
6-16-2
Agamenone F.[4]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Masur D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Zeppieri G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-726-26-4
Sels J.
Potenza L.
6-16-4
Halys Q.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-37-65