Gianluca Mager vs Javier Barranco Cosano — Las Palmas CH Round of 16

Las Palmas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA2
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
clay
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Mager G.
6-2 4-6 6-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Mager G.
6462
Barranco Cosano J.
2631

Gianluca Mager defeated Javier Barranco Cosano 6-2 4-6 6-3 in the Las Palmas CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Gianluca Mager closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mager G.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Barranco Cosano J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mager G.Barranco Cosano J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 171). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mager G.Barranco Cosano J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
70
Break points won·Dominant
4
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mager G.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Barranco Cosano J.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
4.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mager G.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mager G.[2]
Bonadio R.
6-27-65
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Ajdukovic D.
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Mager G.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-26-1
Bonadio R.
Moreno De Alboran N.
3-66-36-2
Ajdukovic D.
Caruso S.[4]
7-641-66-4
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Nikles J.
6-16-3
R16
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Martin Tiffon P.
7-656-1
Mager G.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-24-66-3
Brancaccio R.
Esteve Lobato E.
7-626-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Rosol L.
3-66-16-4
Nikles J.
Oliveira G.
5-77-57-5
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-56-1
Bonadio R.
Martin A.[3]
7-667-5
Caruso S.[4]
Gimeno Valero C.
6-36-4
R32
Barranco Cosano J.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-4
Esteve Lobato E.
Domingues J.
6-746-27-62
Brancaccio R.
Moroni G.[6]
6-06-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-06-2
Rosol L.
Giannessi A.[5]
7-673-67-62
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Giustino L.[8]
6-26-2
Gimeno Valero C.
Skatov T.
6-26-1
Caruso S.[4]
Lopez Montagud C.
5-76-06-4
Nikles J.
Gaio F.[7]
2-67-666-3
Oliveira G.
Bourgue M.
6-46-1
Martin Tiffon P.
Zekic M.
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Darderi L.
6-26-4
Ajdukovic D.
Damas M.
6-46-0
Bonadio R.
Perchicot M.
6-16-2
Mager G.[2]
Toledo Bague P.
6-46-2
Martin A.[3]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-16-1