Cristina Bucsa vs Alize Cornet — Lyon Round of 32

Lyon · WTA · Round of 32
Cristina Bucsa
ESP
Cristina Bucsa
#41WTA
1722ELO
1710Hard ELO
$900kYTD
$5.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
hard
FRA4
Alize Cornet
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Bucsa C.
1-6 6-4 6-1
Cornet A.
Bucsa C.
1662
Cornet A.
6411

Cristina Bucsa defeated Alize Cornet 1-6 6-4 6-1 in the Lyon round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alize Cornet came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bucsa C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cornet A.

Cornet A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bucsa C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bucsa C.Cornet A.
22
Serve
—
52
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bucsa C.Cornet A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
55%
Aces / match·Even
1.1
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bucsa C.Cornet A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
60
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
57
Break points won·Slight edge
93
83
Deciding sets·Slight edge
68
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
27
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bucsa C.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Cornet A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Country comfort
7.3
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
8°CClear
Wind 3 km/hHumidity 73%

Draw

Final
Zhang S.[8]
Yastremska D.
3-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Zhang S.[8]
Garcia C.
6-27-5
Yastremska D.
Cirstea S.[2]
7-654-66-4
Quarter-finals
Yastremska D.
Paolini J.[5]
6-47-63
Zhang S.[8]
Diatchenko V.
3-0
Cirstea S.[2]
Bondar A.
6-36-3
Garcia C.
Van Uytvanck A.[7]
4-66-37-5
R16
Bondar A.
Boulter K.
6-3
Van Uytvanck A.[7]
Gracheva V.
6-26-4
Diatchenko V.
Golubic V.[3]
7-644-66-4
Paolini J.[5]
Korpatsch T.
6-16-2
Yastremska D.
Bucsa C.
6-26-3
Zhang S.[8]
Rus A.
6-46-4
Garcia C.
Trevisan M.
6-42-66-3
Cirstea S.[2]
Voegele S.
6-37-5
R32
Gracheva V.
Kucova K.
7-607-62
Boulter K.
Konjuh A.[6]
5-76-06-3
Garcia C.
Giorgi C.[1]
5-76-46-0
Trevisan M.
Cocciaretto E.
6-36-2
Van Uytvanck A.[7]
Zvonareva V.
6-06-3
Golubic V.[3]
Hontama M.
1-66-46-4
Diatchenko V.
Friedsam A.
6-32-66-4
Rus A.
Kovinic D.
6-26-0
Zhang S.[8]
Mladenovic K.
7-637-5
Paolini J.[5]
Bara I.
4-67-56-3
Korpatsch T.
Dodin O.
6-31-66-2
Yastremska D.
Bogdan A.
3-67-677-67
Bucsa C.
Cornet A.[4]
1-66-46-1
Bondar A.
Miyazaki Y.
6-756-37-5
Voegele S.
Jacquemot E.
4-66-26-3
Cirstea S.[2]
Bolkvadze M.
6-36-1