Gijs Brouwer vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — Turin CH Round of 32

Turin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gijs Brouwer
NED
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
clay
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1383Clay ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Brouwer G.
7-5 6-2
Ficovich J.
Brouwer G.
762
Ficovich J.
520

Gijs Brouwer defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 7-5 6-2 in the Turin CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Juan Pablo Ficovich came in ranked #224, leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Gijs Brouwer had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 4 on clay. Gijs Brouwer claimed a first win over Juan Pablo Ficovich in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Gijs Brouwer closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-05-29Roland GarrosQ1clayJuan Pablo Ficovich6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Brouwer G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brouwer G.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.8
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brouwer G.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Even
19
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
76
Break points won·Even
6
9
Deciding sets·Slight edge
22
27
Tiebreaks·Even
3
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brouwer G.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ficovich J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
6.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.1
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brouwer G.Ficovich J.
Freshness·Slight edge
92
86

Brouwer G.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d) · Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[2]
Halys Q.[1]
7-6116-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[1]
Sels J.
4-67-637-60
Moraing M.[2]
Pospisil V.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Sels J.
Mmoh M.
7-677-5
Halys Q.[1]
Masur D.[6]
7-56-1
Moraing M.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[3]
Escoffier A.
7-646-4
R16
Moraing M.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
6-747-636-2
Sels J.
Fabbiano T.[5]
4-66-36-4
Mmoh M.
Agamenone F.[4]
6-26-4
Halys Q.[1]
Fils A.
6-757-656-4
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Pospisil V.[3]
Blanch U.
6-33-66-3
Masur D.[6]
Zeppieri G.
7-57-5
R32
Fils A.
Viola M.
3-67-646-2
Moraing M.[2]
Guinard M.
6-42-66-4
Brouwer G.
Ficovich J.
7-56-2
Jianu F.
Nardi L.
6-27-63
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
Kamke T.
6-36-1
Pospisil V.[3]
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Blanch U.
Eysseric J.
6-46-1
Escoffier A.
Lenz J.
6-07-66
Peniston R.
Marterer M.[8]
7-687-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Bemelmans R.
5-76-37-65
Mmoh M.
Zhang Z.
6-16-2
Agamenone F.[4]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Masur D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Zeppieri G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-726-26-4
Sels J.
Potenza L.
6-16-4
Halys Q.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-37-65