Vasek Pospisil vs Ulises Blanch — Turin CH Round of 16

Turin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CAN3
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
clay
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
Pospisil V.
6-3 3-6 6-3
Blanch U.
Pospisil V.
6362
Blanch U.
3631

Vasek Pospisil defeated Ulises Blanch 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the Turin CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Vasek Pospisil closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Even
56%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.5
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 113). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
19
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
83
Break points won·Slight edge
7
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil V.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Blanch U.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.1
Surface form
3.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[2]
Halys Q.[1]
7-6116-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[1]
Sels J.
4-67-637-60
Moraing M.[2]
Pospisil V.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Sels J.
Mmoh M.
7-677-5
Halys Q.[1]
Masur D.[6]
7-56-1
Moraing M.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[3]
Escoffier A.
7-646-4
R16
Moraing M.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
6-747-636-2
Sels J.
Fabbiano T.[5]
4-66-36-4
Mmoh M.
Agamenone F.[4]
6-26-4
Halys Q.[1]
Fils A.
6-757-656-4
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Pospisil V.[3]
Blanch U.
6-33-66-3
Masur D.[6]
Zeppieri G.
7-57-5
R32
Fils A.
Viola M.
3-67-646-2
Moraing M.[2]
Guinard M.
6-42-66-4
Brouwer G.
Ficovich J.
7-56-2
Jianu F.
Nardi L.
6-27-63
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
Kamke T.
6-36-1
Pospisil V.[3]
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Blanch U.
Eysseric J.
6-46-1
Escoffier A.
Lenz J.
6-07-66
Peniston R.
Marterer M.[8]
7-687-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Bemelmans R.
5-76-37-65
Mmoh M.
Zhang Z.
6-16-2
Agamenone F.[4]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Masur D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Zeppieri G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-726-26-4
Sels J.
Potenza L.
6-16-4
Halys Q.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-37-65