Ulises Blanch vs Jonathan Eysseric — Turin CH Round of 32

Turin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 February 2022
clay
FRA
Jonathan Eysseric
36 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Blanch U.
6-4 6-1
Eysseric J.
Blanch U.
662
Eysseric J.
410

Ulises Blanch defeated Jonathan Eysseric 6-4 6-1 in the Turin CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Eysseric J.

Eysseric J.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve advantage — Blanch U.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Eysseric J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Eysseric J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
19
0
Break points saved·Dominant
83
26
Break points won·Clear edge
2
18
Deciding sets·Slight edge
19
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanch U.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Eysseric J.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 175 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
1.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[2]
Halys Q.[1]
7-6116-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[1]
Sels J.
4-67-637-60
Moraing M.[2]
Pospisil V.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Sels J.
Mmoh M.
7-677-5
Halys Q.[1]
Masur D.[6]
7-56-1
Moraing M.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[3]
Escoffier A.
7-646-4
R16
Moraing M.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-46-4
Jianu F.
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
6-747-636-2
Sels J.
Fabbiano T.[5]
4-66-36-4
Mmoh M.
Agamenone F.[4]
6-26-4
Halys Q.[1]
Fils A.
6-757-656-4
Escoffier A.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Pospisil V.[3]
Blanch U.
6-33-66-3
Masur D.[6]
Zeppieri G.
7-57-5
R32
Fils A.
Viola M.
3-67-646-2
Moraing M.[2]
Guinard M.
6-42-66-4
Brouwer G.
Ficovich J.
7-56-2
Jianu F.
Nardi L.
6-27-63
Van Rijthoven T.[7]
Kamke T.
6-36-1
Pospisil V.[3]
Geerts M.
6-36-4
Blanch U.
Eysseric J.
6-46-1
Escoffier A.
Lenz J.
6-07-66
Peniston R.
Marterer M.[8]
7-687-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Bemelmans R.
5-76-37-65
Mmoh M.
Zhang Z.
6-16-2
Agamenone F.[4]
Moriya H.
6-46-4
Masur D.[6]
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Zeppieri G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-726-26-4
Sels J.
Potenza L.
6-16-4
Halys Q.[1]
Vavassori A.
6-37-65