Qiang Wang vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova — Guadalajara Quarter-final

Guadalajara · WTA · Quarter-final
CHN
Qiang Wang
34 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
SVK
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova
31 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Wang Q.
6-2 6-3
Schmiedlova A.
Wang Q.
662
Schmiedlova A.
230

Qiang Wang defeated Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 6-2 6-3 in the Guadalajara quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Anna Karolina Schmiedlova came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang Q.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Schmiedlova A.

Schmiedlova A.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Wang Q.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wang Q.Schmiedlova A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
44%
Service points won·Even
56%
54%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
54%
51%
Aces / match·Even
2.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 160). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang Q.Schmiedlova A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
48
Break points saved·Dominant
46
20
Break points won·Slight edge
74
85
Deciding sets·Dominant
46
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang Q.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Schmiedlova A.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
1.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Stephens S.[6]
Bouzkova M.
7-51-66-2
Semi-finals
Bouzkova M.
Wang Q.
6-36-3
Stephens S.[6]
Kalinskaya A.
3-67-5
Quarter-finals
Stephens S.[6]
Saville D.
4-66-36-2
Kalinskaya A.
Osorio C.[4]
6-46-1
Wang Q.
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-3
Bouzkova M.
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
6-46-1
R16
Saville D.
Dolehide C.
6-16-3
Kalinskaya A.
Wang X.
6-40-66-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Frech M.
6-06-2
Schmiedlova A.
Potapova A.
6-37-65
Wang Q.
Tan H.
6-46-2
Stephens S.[6]
Paquet C.
7-56-4
Bouzkova M.
Bronzetti L.
7-626-2
Osorio C.[4]
Baptiste H.
1-66-36-3
R32
Potapova A.
Tsurenko L.
6-42-2
Saville D.
Raducanu E.[1]
5-77-644-3
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Volynets K.
6-46-1
Dolehide C.
Zhu L.
4-66-36-4
Kalinskaya A.
Zheng Q.[8]
6-32-66-2
Bouzkova M.
Doi M.[7]
4-67-56-4
Schmiedlova A.
Parrizas Diaz N.[5]
6-16-4
Wang Q.
Davis L.
6-26-1
Stephens S.[6]
Fruhvirtova B.
6-26-2
Bronzetti L.
Mcnally C.
6-756-36-3
Wang X.
Udvardy P.
6-44-66-1
Frech M.
Zarazua R.
7-654-66-4
Paquet C.
Masarova R.
7-57-5
Baptiste H.
Hruncakova V.
6-36-3
Osorio C.[4]
Tomova V.
6-46-3
Tan H.
Keys M.[2]
6-41-66-1