Jack Draper vs Michael Mmoh — Forli 5 CH Quarter-final

Forli 5 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Draper J.
5-7 6-4 6-2
Mmoh M.
Draper J.
5662
Mmoh M.
7421

Jack Draper defeated Michael Mmoh 5-7 6-4 6-2 in the Forli 5 CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #145, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jack Draper extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-08-28US OpenR32hardJack Draper6-4 6-2 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve advantage — Draper J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.0
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
88
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
91
Break points won·Dominant
83
31
Deciding sets·Slight edge
96
90
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.4+183 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.6Hard Elo 1599
8.6Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1613
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
5.3
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Draper J.: 18 days rest · Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.
Ritschard A.
3-66-37-68
Semi-finals
Draper J.
Basic M.
6-26-736-4
Ritschard A.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Basic M.
Horansky F.
6-36-1
Draper J.
Mmoh M.
5-76-46-2
Ritschard A.
Borges N.
6-47-67
Van Rijthoven T.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
R16
Mmoh M.
Bergs Z.[7]
6-46-2
Basic M.
Moraing M.[4]
6-37-64
Horansky F.
Schnur B.
4-67-656-4
Ritschard A.
Marchenko I.[6]
6-37-5
Borges N.
Caruso S.[3]
6-24-67-63
Van Rijthoven T.
Sels J.
6-47-64
Machac T.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Draper J.
Ferrari G.
6-26-4
R32
Basic M.
Cobolli F.
6-37-62
Ferrari G.
Dzumhur D.[2]
7-57-64
Draper J.
De Jong J.
4-66-47-64
Mmoh M.
Sachko V.
7-626-4
Bergs Z.[7]
Arnaldi M.
6-47-5
Horansky F.
Giustino L.
6-776-46-3
Schnur B.
Grenier H.[5]
3-66-46-2
Ritschard A.
Elias G.
6-756-26-3
Borges N.
Pellegrino A.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Agamenone F.[8]
6-46-4
Sels J.
Maestrelli F.
7-656-3
Napolitano S.
Ejupovic E.
6-756-37-61
Marchenko I.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-7116-4
Machac T.[1]
Lacko L.
6-26-2
Moraing M.[4]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4