Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Nuria Parrizas Diaz — Guadalajara Round of 32

Guadalajara · WTA · Round of 32
SVK
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova
31 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
ESP5
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
#577WTA
1398ELO
1400Hard ELO
34 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Schmiedlova A.
6-1 6-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Schmiedlova A.
662
Parrizas Diaz N.
140

Anna Karolina Schmiedlova defeated Nuria Parrizas Diaz 6-1 6-4 in the Guadalajara round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Anna Karolina Schmiedlova came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Schmiedlova A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Parrizas Diaz N.

Parrizas Diaz N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Schmiedlova A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Schmiedlova A.Parrizas Diaz N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
54%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
51%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (160 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Schmiedlova A.Parrizas Diaz N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
20
36
Break points won·Slight edge
85
79
Deciding sets·Clear edge
88
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Schmiedlova A.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Parrizas Diaz N.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 35 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.6
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Stephens S.[6]
Bouzkova M.
7-51-66-2
Semi-finals
Bouzkova M.
Wang Q.
6-36-3
Stephens S.[6]
Kalinskaya A.
3-67-5
Quarter-finals
Stephens S.[6]
Saville D.
4-66-36-2
Kalinskaya A.
Osorio C.[4]
6-46-1
Wang Q.
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-3
Bouzkova M.
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
6-46-1
R16
Saville D.
Dolehide C.
6-16-3
Kalinskaya A.
Wang X.
6-40-66-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Frech M.
6-06-2
Schmiedlova A.
Potapova A.
6-37-65
Wang Q.
Tan H.
6-46-2
Stephens S.[6]
Paquet C.
7-56-4
Bouzkova M.
Bronzetti L.
7-626-2
Osorio C.[4]
Baptiste H.
1-66-36-3
R32
Potapova A.
Tsurenko L.
6-42-2
Saville D.
Raducanu E.[1]
5-77-644-3
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Volynets K.
6-46-1
Dolehide C.
Zhu L.
4-66-36-4
Kalinskaya A.
Zheng Q.[8]
6-32-66-2
Bouzkova M.
Doi M.[7]
4-67-56-4
Schmiedlova A.
Parrizas Diaz N.[5]
6-16-4
Wang Q.
Davis L.
6-26-1
Stephens S.[6]
Fruhvirtova B.
6-26-2
Bronzetti L.
Mcnally C.
6-756-36-3
Wang X.
Udvardy P.
6-44-66-1
Frech M.
Zarazua R.
7-654-66-4
Paquet C.
Masarova R.
7-57-5
Baptiste H.
Hruncakova V.
6-36-3
Osorio C.[4]
Tomova V.
6-46-3
Tan H.
Keys M.[2]
6-41-66-1