Qiang Wang vs Lauren Davis — Guadalajara Round of 32

Guadalajara · WTA · Round of 32
CHN
Qiang Wang
34 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
USA
Lauren Davis
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Wang Q.
6-2 6-1
Davis L.
Wang Q.
662
Davis L.
210

Qiang Wang defeated Lauren Davis 6-2 6-1 in the Guadalajara round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Qiang Wang came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Qiang Wang extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-06-17BirminghamR32grassQiang Wang6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Wang Q.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Davis L.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Wang Q.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wang Q.Davis L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
53%
51%
Aces / match·Even
1.9
1.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang Q.Davis L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
46
26
Break points won·Slight edge
74
79
Deciding sets·Dominant
46
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang Q.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Davis L.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Stephens S.[6]
Bouzkova M.
7-51-66-2
Semi-finals
Bouzkova M.
Wang Q.
6-36-3
Stephens S.[6]
Kalinskaya A.
3-67-5
Quarter-finals
Stephens S.[6]
Saville D.
4-66-36-2
Kalinskaya A.
Osorio C.[4]
6-46-1
Wang Q.
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-3
Bouzkova M.
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
6-46-1
R16
Saville D.
Dolehide C.
6-16-3
Kalinskaya A.
Wang X.
6-40-66-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Frech M.
6-06-2
Schmiedlova A.
Potapova A.
6-37-65
Wang Q.
Tan H.
6-46-2
Stephens S.[6]
Paquet C.
7-56-4
Bouzkova M.
Bronzetti L.
7-626-2
Osorio C.[4]
Baptiste H.
1-66-36-3
R32
Potapova A.
Tsurenko L.
6-42-2
Saville D.
Raducanu E.[1]
5-77-644-3
Sorribes Tormo S.[3]
Volynets K.
6-46-1
Dolehide C.
Zhu L.
4-66-36-4
Kalinskaya A.
Zheng Q.[8]
6-32-66-2
Bouzkova M.
Doi M.[7]
4-67-56-4
Schmiedlova A.
Parrizas Diaz N.[5]
6-16-4
Wang Q.
Davis L.
6-26-1
Stephens S.[6]
Fruhvirtova B.
6-26-2
Bronzetti L.
Mcnally C.
6-756-36-3
Wang X.
Udvardy P.
6-44-66-1
Frech M.
Zarazua R.
7-654-66-4
Paquet C.
Masarova R.
7-57-5
Baptiste H.
Hruncakova V.
6-36-3
Osorio C.[4]
Tomova V.
6-46-3
Tan H.
Keys M.[2]
6-41-66-1