Nuno Borges vs Salvatore Caruso — Forli 5 CH Round of 16

Forli 5 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Nuno Borges
POR
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
ITA3
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
Borges N.
6-2 4-6 7-6
Caruso S.
Borges N.
64772
Caruso S.
26631

Nuno Borges defeated Salvatore Caruso 6-2 4-6 7-6 in the Forli 5 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Nuno Borges closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Borges N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Caruso S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Borges N.Caruso S.
36
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Borges N.Caruso S.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
1.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 113). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Borges N.Caruso S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
41
Break points saved·Dominant
98
65
Break points won·Clear edge
54
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
96
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Borges N.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Caruso S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Borges N.Caruso S.
Freshness·
96
—

Borges N.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.
Ritschard A.
3-66-37-68
Semi-finals
Draper J.
Basic M.
6-26-736-4
Ritschard A.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Basic M.
Horansky F.
6-36-1
Draper J.
Mmoh M.
5-76-46-2
Ritschard A.
Borges N.
6-47-67
Van Rijthoven T.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
R16
Mmoh M.
Bergs Z.[7]
6-46-2
Basic M.
Moraing M.[4]
6-37-64
Horansky F.
Schnur B.
4-67-656-4
Ritschard A.
Marchenko I.[6]
6-37-5
Borges N.
Caruso S.[3]
6-24-67-63
Van Rijthoven T.
Sels J.
6-47-64
Machac T.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Draper J.
Ferrari G.
6-26-4
R32
Basic M.
Cobolli F.
6-37-62
Ferrari G.
Dzumhur D.[2]
7-57-64
Draper J.
De Jong J.
4-66-47-64
Mmoh M.
Sachko V.
7-626-4
Bergs Z.[7]
Arnaldi M.
6-47-5
Horansky F.
Giustino L.
6-776-46-3
Schnur B.
Grenier H.[5]
3-66-46-2
Ritschard A.
Elias G.
6-756-26-3
Borges N.
Pellegrino A.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Agamenone F.[8]
6-46-4
Sels J.
Maestrelli F.
7-656-3
Napolitano S.
Ejupovic E.
6-756-37-61
Marchenko I.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-7116-4
Machac T.[1]
Lacko L.
6-26-2
Moraing M.[4]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4