Michael Mmoh vs Zizou Bergs — Forli 5 CH Round of 16

Forli 5 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
Zizou Bergs
BEL7
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Mmoh M.
6-4 6-2
Bergs Z.
Mmoh M.
662
Bergs Z.
420

Michael Mmoh defeated Zizou Bergs 6-4 6-2 in the Forli 5 CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mmoh M.Bergs Z.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
6.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Even
66
69
Break points saved·Even
91
95
Break points won·Slight edge
31
21
Deciding sets·Even
90
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Bergs Z.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Hard Elo 1599
Surface ELO
6.9+157 Hard Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1808
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
4.5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.2
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Bergs Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
95
82

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.
Ritschard A.
3-66-37-68
Semi-finals
Draper J.
Basic M.
6-26-736-4
Ritschard A.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Basic M.
Horansky F.
6-36-1
Draper J.
Mmoh M.
5-76-46-2
Ritschard A.
Borges N.
6-47-67
Van Rijthoven T.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
R16
Mmoh M.
Bergs Z.[7]
6-46-2
Basic M.
Moraing M.[4]
6-37-64
Horansky F.
Schnur B.
4-67-656-4
Ritschard A.
Marchenko I.[6]
6-37-5
Borges N.
Caruso S.[3]
6-24-67-63
Van Rijthoven T.
Sels J.
6-47-64
Machac T.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Draper J.
Ferrari G.
6-26-4
R32
Basic M.
Cobolli F.
6-37-62
Ferrari G.
Dzumhur D.[2]
7-57-64
Draper J.
De Jong J.
4-66-47-64
Mmoh M.
Sachko V.
7-626-4
Bergs Z.[7]
Arnaldi M.
6-47-5
Horansky F.
Giustino L.
6-776-46-3
Schnur B.
Grenier H.[5]
3-66-46-2
Ritschard A.
Elias G.
6-756-26-3
Borges N.
Pellegrino A.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Agamenone F.[8]
6-46-4
Sels J.
Maestrelli F.
7-656-3
Napolitano S.
Ejupovic E.
6-756-37-61
Marchenko I.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-7116-4
Machac T.[1]
Lacko L.
6-26-2
Moraing M.[4]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4