Jack Draper vs Mirza Basic — Forli 5 CH Semi-final

Forli 5 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Draper J.
6-2 6-7 6-4
Basic M.
Draper J.
66362
Basic M.
27741

Jack Draper defeated Mirza Basic 6-2 6-7 6-4 in the Forli 5 CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #145.

Key context

  • Match story: Jack Draper closed it out in three sets, 6–2 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Basic M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve advantage — Draper J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Basic M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Basic M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
33
Break points saved·Dominant
99
56
Break points won·Dominant
83
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Basic M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.5
Surface form
3.1
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Minutes 14d
9.3
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Basic M.
Freshness·
100
—

Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.
Ritschard A.
3-66-37-68
Semi-finals
Draper J.
Basic M.
6-26-736-4
Ritschard A.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Basic M.
Horansky F.
6-36-1
Draper J.
Mmoh M.
5-76-46-2
Ritschard A.
Borges N.
6-47-67
Van Rijthoven T.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
R16
Mmoh M.
Bergs Z.[7]
6-46-2
Basic M.
Moraing M.[4]
6-37-64
Horansky F.
Schnur B.
4-67-656-4
Ritschard A.
Marchenko I.[6]
6-37-5
Borges N.
Caruso S.[3]
6-24-67-63
Van Rijthoven T.
Sels J.
6-47-64
Machac T.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Draper J.
Ferrari G.
6-26-4
R32
Basic M.
Cobolli F.
6-37-62
Ferrari G.
Dzumhur D.[2]
7-57-64
Draper J.
De Jong J.
4-66-47-64
Mmoh M.
Sachko V.
7-626-4
Bergs Z.[7]
Arnaldi M.
6-47-5
Horansky F.
Giustino L.
6-776-46-3
Schnur B.
Grenier H.[5]
3-66-46-2
Ritschard A.
Elias G.
6-756-26-3
Borges N.
Pellegrino A.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Agamenone F.[8]
6-46-4
Sels J.
Maestrelli F.
7-656-3
Napolitano S.
Ejupovic E.
6-756-37-61
Marchenko I.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-7116-4
Machac T.[1]
Lacko L.
6-26-2
Moraing M.[4]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4