Facundo Bagnis vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles — Santiago Round of 32

Santiago · ATP · Round of 32
ARG8
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
clay
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Bagnis F.
6-3 6-0
Zapata Miralles B.
Bagnis F.
662
Zapata Miralles B.
300

Facundo Bagnis defeated Bernabe Zapata Miralles 6-3 6-0 in the Santiago round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Zapata Miralles B.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Zapata Miralles B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Zapata Miralles B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
54
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
74
Break points won·Dominant
35
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
56
Tiebreaks·Even
3
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Zapata Miralles B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+176 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Clay Elo 1407
7.2Overall Elo 1591
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1413
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.5
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
6.5
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
23°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 36%
Final
Martinez P.[4]
Baez S.[7]
4-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Martinez P.[4]
Tabilo A.
5-76-46-4
Baez S.[7]
Ramos A.[2]
6-44-66-2
Quarter-finals
Baez S.[7]
Monteiro T.
7-53-66-4
Tabilo A.
Kecmanovic M.[6]
6-16-4
Martinez P.[4]
Hanfmann Y.
6-26-2
Ramos A.[2]
Bagnis F.[8]
7-56-2
R16
Tabilo A.
Garin C.[1]
6-36-3
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-0
Martinez P.[4]
Munar J.
6-45-77-5
Hanfmann Y.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-16-3
Baez S.[7]
Londero J.
6-36-3
Monteiro T.
Delbonis F.[3]
3-66-46-1
Bagnis F.[8]
Dellien H.
6-26-2
Ramos A.[2]
Taberner C.
6-27-64
R32
Bagnis F.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-36-0
Seyboth Wild T.
Kicker N.
6-43-66-4
Tabilo A.
Olivo R.
6-16-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Rune H.
6-46-4
Kecmanovic M.[6]
Cecchinato M.
7-56-1
Munar J.
Galan D.
6-16-3
Hanfmann Y.
Coria F.[5]
3-66-26-4
Baez S.[7]
Varillas J.
6-46-4
Londero J.
Etcheverry T.
4-66-47-5
Monteiro T.
Jarry N.
7-696-4
Dellien H.
Lama G.
6-36-4
Taberner C.
Cerundolo J.
6-27-5