Amanda Anisimova vs Beatriz Haddad Maia — Doha Round of 64

Doha · WTA · Round of 64
Amanda Anisimova
USA
Amanda Anisimova
#6WTA
1914ELO
1880Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$14MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
Beatriz Haddad Maia
BRA
Beatriz Haddad Maia
#134WTA
1615ELO
1580Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Anisimova A.
7-5 6-4
Haddad Maia B.
Anisimova A.
762
Haddad Maia B.
540

Amanda Anisimova defeated Beatriz Haddad Maia 7-5 6-4 in the Doha round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Amanda Anisimova came in ranked #6, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Amanda Anisimova extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-25US OpenR16hardAmanda Anisimova6-0 6-3
2023-01-09Adelaide 2R16hardBeatriz Haddad Maia6-4 7-5
2019-04-08BogotaSFclayAmanda Anisimova4-6 7-6(2) 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Anisimova A.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Haddad Maia B.

Haddad Maia B.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Anisimova A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Anisimova A.Haddad Maia B.
51
Serve
9
72
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Anisimova A.Haddad Maia B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Anisimova A.Haddad Maia B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
96
87
Break points saved·Even
95
92
Break points won·Slight edge
99
88
Deciding sets·Slight edge
95
89
Tiebreaks·Even
94
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Anisimova A.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Haddad Maia B.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
9.6+300 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.4Hard Elo 1580
9.5Overall Elo 1914
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1615
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
3.4
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Anisimova A.Haddad Maia B.
Freshness·Slight edge
87
98

Anisimova A.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Haddad Maia B.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 34 km/hHumidity 28%

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[7]
Kontaveit A.[4]
6-26-0
Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[7]
Sakkari M.[6]
6-46-3
Kontaveit A.[4]
Ostapenko J.[15]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Swiatek I.[7]
Sabalenka A.[1]
6-26-3
Sakkari M.[6]
Gauff C.[14]
6-36-3
Ostapenko J.[15]
Muguruza G.[5]
6-26-2
Kontaveit A.[4]
Jabeur O.[8]
6-46-1
R16
Sabalenka A.[1]
Teichmann J.
6-26-1
Swiatek I.[7]
Kasatkina D.
6-36-0
Gauff C.[14]
Badosa P.[3]
6-26-3
Kontaveit A.[4]
Mertens E.[16]
6-30-66-2
Ostapenko J.[15]
Krejcikova B.[2]
6-36-2
Jabeur O.[8]
Martincova T.
6-13-66-3
Muguruza G.[5]
Brengle M.
6-06-2
Sakkari M.[6]
Pegula J.[9]
6-47-5
R32
Sabalenka A.[1]
Cornet A.
6-26-2
Mertens E.[16]
Kvitova P.
7-51-2
Brengle M.
Azarenka V.[12]
W/O
Swiatek I.[7]
Golubic V.
6-23-66-2
Gauff C.[14]
Garcia C.
6-27-63
Pegula J.[9]
Juvan K.
6-36-3
Sakkari M.[6]
Li A.
6-36-3
Jabeur O.[8]
Sasnovich A.
1-67-56-3
Muguruza G.[5]
Cirstea S.
7-646-1
Ostapenko J.[15]
Anisimova A.
6-34-66-4
Kasatkina D.
Cristian J.
2-62-2
Kontaveit A.[4]
Konjuh A.
6-26-3
Badosa P.[3]
Tauson C.
6-16-2
Martincova T.
Rus A.
6-26-4
Krejcikova B.[2]
Linette M.
6-16-3
Teichmann J.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-697-5
R64
Van Uytvanck A.
Zvonareva V.
6-46-4
Teichmann J.
Kerber A.[13]
4-66-36-2
Cristian J.
Rybakina E.[11]
6-46-3
Kasatkina D.
Tomljanovic A.
6-46-746-2
Golubic V.
Petkovic A.
6-46-4
Pegula J.[9]
Siniakova K.
6-36-2
Rus A.
Kudermetova V.
7-656-4
Martincova T.
Svitolina E.[10]
6-727-57-65
Mertens E.[16]
Paolini J.
6-32-67-5
Kvitova P.
Begu I.
6-36-1
Konjuh A.
Kostyuk M.
4-67-56-3
Brengle M.
Oz I.
7-56-3
Azarenka V.[12]
Putintseva Y.
5-76-27-5
Ostapenko J.[15]
Dodin O.
6-46-2
Anisimova A.
Haddad Maia B.
7-56-4
Linette M.
Riske Amritraj A.
2-67-656-1
Tauson C.
Bencic B.
6-43-66-3
Cirstea S.
Sherif M.
6-26-1
Garcia C.
Halep S.
6-46-3
Li A.
Kenin S.
6-36-756-3
Juvan K.
Voegele S.
6-46-2
Cornet A.
Samsonova L.
3-66-47-5
Sasnovich A.
Zhang S.
6-16-1
Gauff C.[14]
Rogers S.
6-26-3