Tim Van Rijthoven vs Franco Agamenone — Forli 5 CH Round of 32

Forli 5 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 February 2022
hard
Franco Agamenone
ITA8
Franco Agamenone
#270ATP
1454ELO
1347Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWW
Van Rijthoven T.
6-4 6-4
Agamenone F.
Van Rijthoven T.
662
Agamenone F.
440

Tim Van Rijthoven defeated Franco Agamenone 6-4 6-4 in the Forli 5 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tim Van Rijthoven edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Rijthoven T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Agamenone F.

Agamenone F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Serve advantage — Van Rijthoven T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Rijthoven T.Agamenone F.
1st serve in·Even
66%
66%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
77%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Rijthoven T.Agamenone F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
40
Break points saved·Dominant
90
59
Break points won·Dominant
1
51
Deciding sets·Clear edge
19
38
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
61
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Rijthoven T.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Agamenone F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.3
Surface form
5.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Rijthoven T.Agamenone F.
Freshness·
—
68

Agamenone F.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.
Ritschard A.
3-66-37-68
Semi-finals
Draper J.
Basic M.
6-26-736-4
Ritschard A.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Basic M.
Horansky F.
6-36-1
Draper J.
Mmoh M.
5-76-46-2
Ritschard A.
Borges N.
6-47-67
Van Rijthoven T.
Machac T.[1]
6-37-65
R16
Mmoh M.
Bergs Z.[7]
6-46-2
Basic M.
Moraing M.[4]
6-37-64
Horansky F.
Schnur B.
4-67-656-4
Ritschard A.
Marchenko I.[6]
6-37-5
Borges N.
Caruso S.[3]
6-24-67-63
Van Rijthoven T.
Sels J.
6-47-64
Machac T.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Draper J.
Ferrari G.
6-26-4
R32
Basic M.
Cobolli F.
6-37-62
Ferrari G.
Dzumhur D.[2]
7-57-64
Draper J.
De Jong J.
4-66-47-64
Mmoh M.
Sachko V.
7-626-4
Bergs Z.[7]
Arnaldi M.
6-47-5
Horansky F.
Giustino L.
6-776-46-3
Schnur B.
Grenier H.[5]
3-66-46-2
Ritschard A.
Elias G.
6-756-26-3
Borges N.
Pellegrino A.
6-47-65
Caruso S.[3]
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Agamenone F.[8]
6-46-4
Sels J.
Maestrelli F.
7-656-3
Napolitano S.
Ejupovic E.
6-756-37-61
Marchenko I.[6]
Uchiyama Y.
6-26-7116-4
Machac T.[1]
Lacko L.
6-26-2
Moraing M.[4]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4