Tim Van Rijthoven vs Brayden Schnur — Forli 4 CH Round of 16

Forli 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 February 2022
hard
CAN
Brayden Schnur
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLW
Van Rijthoven T.
7-6 7-5
Schnur B.
Van Rijthoven T.
7772
Schnur B.
6550

Tim Van Rijthoven defeated Brayden Schnur 7-6 7-5 in the Forli 4 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Rijthoven T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Schnur B.

Schnur B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Rijthoven T.Schnur B.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
61%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
7.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Rijthoven T.Schnur B.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
27
Break points saved·Even
90
86
Break points won·Even
1
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
19
14
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
61
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Rijthoven T.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Schnur B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
2.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Borges N.[4]
6-46-2
Draper J.
Watanuki Y.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Watanuki Y.
Barrere G.[3]
7-56-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Haase R.
6-46-3
Borges N.[4]
Lestienne C.
6-36-3
Draper J.
Furness E.
6-26-3
R16
Haase R.
Nava E.
7-56-2
Borges N.[4]
Pellegrino A.
6-16-4
Lestienne C.
Napolitano S.
7-54-66-4
Watanuki Y.
Marterer M.
5-76-26-3
Draper J.
Halys Q.[1]
7-646-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Schnur B.
7-657-5
Barrere G.[3]
Hassan B.
6-13-0
Furness E.
Torpegaard M.
6-14-3
R32
Furness E.
Hoang A.
7-657-64
Haase R.
Moriya H.
7-626-3
Nava E.
Piros Z.
4-66-46-0
Schnur B.
Gigante M.
6-43-66-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-27-61
Borges N.[4]
Giustino L.
7-646-3
Marterer M.
Serdarusic N.
6-756-47-62
Barrere G.[3]
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Torpegaard M.
Moroni G.[5]
7-642-67-66
Lestienne C.
Arnaldi M.
6-25-76-2
Napolitano S.
Elias G.[8]
6-16-4
Watanuki Y.
De Jong J.[7]
6-26-4
Pellegrino A.
Domingues J.
6-16-3
Halys Q.[1]
Sachko V.
6-17-63
Draper J.
Basic M.
6-26-2
Hassan B.
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4