Tim Van Rijthoven vs Brayden Schnur — Forli 4 CH Round of 16
Forli 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 February 2022
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
7.0
Surface form2.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d8.6
7.0
3-set count7.0
7.0
Prev. match7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Van Rijthoven T.
7772
Schnur B.
6550
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form63%1st serve in+1%64%
77%1st serve points won+13%64%
54%2nd serve points won+6%48%
68%Service points won+10%58%
30%Return points won+5%35%
62%Break points saved+5%57%
12.8Aces / match+8.34.5
3.7Double faults / match+0.64.3
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Borges N.[4]
Lestienne C.
6-36-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Haase R.
6-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Barrere G.[3]
7-56-3
Draper J.
Furness E.
6-26-3
R16
Barrere G.[3]
Hassan B.
6-13-0
Watanuki Y.
Marterer M.
5-76-26-3
Furness E.
Torpegaard M.
6-14-3
Borges N.[4]
Pellegrino A.
6-16-4
Lestienne C.
Napolitano S.
7-54-66-4
Haase R.
Nava E.
7-56-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Schnur B.
7-657-5
Draper J.
Halys Q.[1]
7-646-4
R32
Nava E.
Piros Z.
4-66-46-0
Lestienne C.
Arnaldi M.
6-25-76-2
Marterer M.
Serdarusic N.
6-756-47-62
Furness E.
Hoang A.
7-657-64
Napolitano S.
Elias G.[8]
6-16-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-27-61
Borges N.[4]
Giustino L.
7-646-3
Watanuki Y.
De Jong J.[7]
6-26-4
Schnur B.
Gigante M.
6-43-66-1
Pellegrino A.
Domingues J.
6-16-3
Torpegaard M.
Moroni G.[5]
7-642-67-66
Halys Q.[1]
Sachko V.
6-17-63
Barrere G.[3]
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Draper J.
Basic M.
6-26-2
Haase R.
Moriya H.
7-626-3
Hassan B.
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4