Robin Haase vs Emilio Nava — Forli 4 CH Round of 16

Forli 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
NED
Robin Haase
39 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 February 2022
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Haase R.
7-5 6-2
Nava E.
Haase R.
762
Nava E.
520

Robin Haase defeated Emilio Nava 7-5 6-2 in the Forli 4 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Robin Haase closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Haase R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Haase R.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Haase R.Nava E.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Haase R.Nava E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
7.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (68 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Haase R.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
52
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Slight edge
24
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
89
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
13
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Haase R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nava E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Haase R.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Draper J.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Borges N.[4]
6-46-2
Draper J.
Watanuki Y.
6-34-66-3
Quarter-finals
Watanuki Y.
Barrere G.[3]
7-56-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Haase R.
6-46-3
Borges N.[4]
Lestienne C.
6-36-3
Draper J.
Furness E.
6-26-3
R16
Haase R.
Nava E.
7-56-2
Borges N.[4]
Pellegrino A.
6-16-4
Lestienne C.
Napolitano S.
7-54-66-4
Watanuki Y.
Marterer M.
5-76-26-3
Draper J.
Halys Q.[1]
7-646-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Schnur B.
7-657-5
Barrere G.[3]
Hassan B.
6-13-0
Furness E.
Torpegaard M.
6-14-3
R32
Furness E.
Hoang A.
7-657-64
Haase R.
Moriya H.
7-626-3
Nava E.
Piros Z.
4-66-46-0
Schnur B.
Gigante M.
6-43-66-1
Van Rijthoven T.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-27-61
Borges N.[4]
Giustino L.
7-646-3
Marterer M.
Serdarusic N.
6-756-47-62
Barrere G.[3]
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Torpegaard M.
Moroni G.[5]
7-642-67-66
Lestienne C.
Arnaldi M.
6-25-76-2
Napolitano S.
Elias G.[8]
6-16-4
Watanuki Y.
De Jong J.[7]
6-26-4
Pellegrino A.
Domingues J.
6-16-3
Halys Q.[1]
Sachko V.
6-17-63
Draper J.
Basic M.
6-26-2
Hassan B.
Bemelmans R.
6-46-4