Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Thomas Fabbiano — Doha Round of 32

Doha · ATP · Round of 32
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 February 2022
hard
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-2 7-6
Fabbiano T.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6772
Fabbiano T.
2650

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Thomas Fabbiano 6-2 7-6 in the Doha round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Fabbiano T.
41
Serve
—
43
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
81
Break points won·Dominant
68
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fabbiano T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
4.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Fabbiano T.
Freshness·
91
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 21 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Bautista Agut R.[2]
Basilashvili N.[3]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Basilashvili N.[3]
Rinderknech A.
6-46-2
Bautista Agut R.[2]
Khachanov K.[6]
2-66-37-5
Quarter-finals
Rinderknech A.
Shapovalov D.[1]
6-46-4
Basilashvili N.[3]
Fucsovics M.
1-66-37-5
Khachanov K.[6]
Cilic M.[4]
3-66-36-4
Bautista Agut R.[2]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-16-1
R16
Davidovich Fokina A.
Evans D.[5]
4-67-56-4
Basilashvili N.[3]
Ymer E.
6-47-5
Shapovalov D.[1]
Molcan A.
6-46-0
Rinderknech A.
Bublik A.[7]
6-756-16-4
Fucsovics M.
Kwon S.
6-36-756-3
Khachanov K.[6]
Ruusuvuori E.
7-646-3
Cilic M.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-37-5
Bautista Agut R.[2]
Murray A.
6-06-1
R32
Davidovich Fokina A.
Jaziri M.
6-16-3
Molcan A.
Oconnell C.
6-747-666-4
Rinderknech A.
Vesely J.
3-67-646-4
Bublik A.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-26-4
Ymer E.
Sousa J.
2-66-37-5
Kwon S.
Eubanks C.
7-661-66-4
Fucsovics M.
Harris L.[8]
6-47-64
Khachanov K.[6]
Mcdonald M.
7-636-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Goffin D.
4-66-46-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Fabbiano T.
6-27-65
Evans D.[5]
Gerasimov E.
6-46-4
Murray A.
Daniel T.
6-26-2