Mikhail Kukushkin vs Tomas Machac — Cherbourg CH Round of 32

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
Tomas Machac
CZE3
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Kukushkin M.
6-3 6-2
Machac T.
Kukushkin M.
662
Machac T.
320

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Tomas Machac 6-3 6-2 in the Cherbourg CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kukushkin M.Machac T.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
54%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
90
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
98
Break points won·Dominant
41
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Machac T.
8.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.5Hard Elo 1526
Surface ELO
8.6+304 Hard Elo edge
1.5Overall Elo 1552
ELO gap
8.5Overall Elo 1866
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.7
Surface form
8.8
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-42-66-4
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.
Gulbis E.
6-746-46-4
Bonzi B.[1]
Bergs Z.
4-67-56-1
Quarter-finals
Gulbis E.
Herbert P.[2]
7-52-66-4
Lestienne C.
Van Assche L.
6-36-726-1
Bergs Z.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Draper J.
7-666-2
R16
Lestienne C.
Kukushkin M.
7-56-3
Bergs Z.
Novak D.[4]
7-56-2
Bonzi B.[1]
De Schepper K.
6-37-64
Gulbis E.
Simon G.[5]
6-32-66-3
Herbert P.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-36-4
Bemelmans R.
Halys Q.[6]
7-635-76-3
Draper J.
Marterer M.
6-46-2
Van Assche L.
Lamasine T.
3-67-644-1
R32
De Schepper K.
Marie J.
4-64-0
Lamasine T.
Pouille L.[8]
6-40-0
Halys Q.[6]
Mayot H.
6-47-62
Bemelmans R.
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Novak D.[4]
Elias G.
6-26-1
Marterer M.
Safiullin R.[7]
6-33-67-5
Draper J.
Barrere G.
6-41-66-3
Forejtek J.
Horansky F.
4-66-16-4
Bonzi B.[1]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Hoang A.
7-57-63
Bergs Z.
Pellegrino A.
7-646-4
Herbert P.[2]
Zuk K.
6-27-64
Simon G.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-656-4
Kukushkin M.
Machac T.[3]
6-36-2
Gulbis E.
Added D.
6-46-4
Lestienne C.
Safwat M.
1-67-636-1