Reilly Opelka vs John Isner — Dallas Semi-final

Dallas · ATP · Semi-final
Reilly Opelka
USA2
Reilly Opelka
#131ATP
1749ELO
1734Hard ELO
$325kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 211 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
USA3
John Isner
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Opelka R.
7-6 7-6
Isner J.
Opelka R.
797242
Isner J.
676220

Reilly Opelka defeated John Isner 7-6 7-6 in the Dallas semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Reilly Opelka came in leading the head-to-head 4–1. Reilly Opelka extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-04-04HoustonFclayReilly Opelka6-3 7-6(7)
2019-07-22AtlantaR16hardReilly Opelka7-6(2) 6-7(5) 7-6(5)
2019-02-11New YorkSFhardReilly Opelka6-7(8) 7-6(14) 7-6(4)
2019-01-14Australian OpenR128hardReilly Opelka7-6(4) 7-6(6) 6-7(4) 7-6(5)
2016-08-01AtlantaSFhardJohn Isner6-7(5) 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Opelka R.serving98% hold

wins 81% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Isner J.serving98% hold

wins 81% of points on serve vs Opelka R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Opelka R.Isner J.
86
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Opelka R.Isner J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
54%
Service points won·Even
70%
71%
Return points won·Even
29%
28%
Break points saved·Even
72%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
16.6
21.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (127 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Opelka R.Isner J.
Clutch Rating·Even
63
64
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Even
1
0
Deciding sets·Even
88
91
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
93
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Opelka R.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Isner J.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.4
Surface form
1.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Opelka R.[2]
Brooksby J.[4]
7-657-63
Semi-finals
Opelka R.[2]
Isner J.[3]
7-677-622
Brooksby J.[4]
Giron M.[7]
6-46-747-65
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.[4]
Thompson J.
6-36-0
Opelka R.[2]
Mannarino A.[5]
6-36-4
Giron M.[7]
Fritz T.[1]
6-43-67-63
Isner J.[3]
Pospisil V.
6-46-4
R16
Isner J.[3]
Anderson K.
7-616-777-65
Fritz T.[1]
Sock J.
6-16-4
Opelka R.[2]
Stebe C.
7-637-68
Pospisil V.
Rodionov J.
6-737-666-2
Giron M.[7]
Broady L.
3-66-36-1
Brooksby J.[4]
Seppi A.
6-33-66-3
Thompson J.
Nakashima B.[8]
7-57-61
Mannarino A.[5]
Nishioka Y.
6-36-1
R32
Nishioka Y.
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Anderson K.
Querrey S.
6-46-4
Broady L.
Gojowczyk P.
6-16-4
Sock J.
Otte O.
6-46-4
Stebe C.
Kudla D.
7-673-66-3
Pospisil V.
Chakravarthi C.
6-16-0
Mannarino A.[5]
Johnson S.
6-726-27-62
Nakashima B.[8]
Millman J.
7-57-63
Giron M.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-46-4
Seppi A.
Altmaier D.
4-66-36-4
Thompson J.
Lopez F.
7-56-3
Rodionov J.
Cressy M.[6]
7-634-66-1