Constant Lestienne vs Ernests Gulbis — Cherbourg CH Semi-final

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
FRA
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
LAT
Ernests Gulbis
37 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLLL
Lestienne C.
6-7 6-4 6-4
Gulbis E.
Lestienne C.
64662
Gulbis E.
77441

Constant Lestienne defeated Ernests Gulbis 6-7 6-4 6-4 in the Cherbourg CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Constant Lestienne came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lestienne C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gulbis E.

Gulbis E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Serve advantage — Lestienne C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lestienne C.Gulbis E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
5.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 52). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lestienne C.Gulbis E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
91
Break points won·Clear edge
39
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
26
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lestienne C.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gulbis E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-42-66-4
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.
Gulbis E.
6-746-46-4
Bonzi B.[1]
Bergs Z.
4-67-56-1
Quarter-finals
Gulbis E.
Herbert P.[2]
7-52-66-4
Lestienne C.
Van Assche L.
6-36-726-1
Bergs Z.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Draper J.
7-666-2
R16
Lestienne C.
Kukushkin M.
7-56-3
Bergs Z.
Novak D.[4]
7-56-2
Bonzi B.[1]
De Schepper K.
6-37-64
Gulbis E.
Simon G.[5]
6-32-66-3
Herbert P.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-36-4
Bemelmans R.
Halys Q.[6]
7-635-76-3
Draper J.
Marterer M.
6-46-2
Van Assche L.
Lamasine T.
3-67-644-1
R32
De Schepper K.
Marie J.
4-64-0
Lamasine T.
Pouille L.[8]
6-40-0
Halys Q.[6]
Mayot H.
6-47-62
Bemelmans R.
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Novak D.[4]
Elias G.
6-26-1
Marterer M.
Safiullin R.[7]
6-33-67-5
Draper J.
Barrere G.
6-41-66-3
Forejtek J.
Horansky F.
4-66-16-4
Bonzi B.[1]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Hoang A.
7-57-63
Bergs Z.
Pellegrino A.
7-646-4
Herbert P.[2]
Zuk K.
6-27-64
Simon G.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-656-4
Kukushkin M.
Machac T.[3]
6-36-2
Gulbis E.
Added D.
6-46-4
Lestienne C.
Safwat M.
1-67-636-1