Chun Hsin Tseng vs Borna Gojo — Bengaluru 1 CH Final

Bengaluru 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1495Hard ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Tseng C.
6-4 7-5
Gojo B.
Tseng C.
672
Gojo B.
450

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 7-5 in the Bengaluru 1 CH final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
67%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.0
10.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
95
Break points won·Slight edge
15
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Gojo B.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.8Hard Elo 1495
Surface ELO
7.2+167 Hard Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1683
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.2
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tseng C.Gojo B.
Freshness·
—
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Couacaud E.[6]
7-56-4
Gojo B.
Muller A.
4-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[6]
Vesely J.[1]
6-40-0
Muller A.
Ilkel C.
6-47-67
Tseng C.
Decamps G.
6-46-4
Gojo B.
Coppejans K.
7-56-4
R16
Couacaud E.[6]
Purcell M.
6-43-66-2
Muller A.
Kuzmanov D.
7-646-4
Decamps G.
Moroni G.
6-25-77-63
Tseng C.
Grenier H.[4]
6-16-4
Vesely J.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
3-66-26-1
Coppejans K.
Celikbilek A.[5]
7-6126-3
Ilkel C.
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-5
Gojo B.
Vukic A.[3]
7-56-3
R32
Decamps G.
Gaio F.[8]
6-36-3
Gunneswaran P.
Bourgue M.
7-646-2
Kuzmanov D.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Jaziri M.
7-6106-4
Gojo B.
Noguchi R.
3-66-16-2
Celikbilek A.[5]
Kadhe A.
6-16-2
Moroni G.
Myneni S.
6-16-1
Tseng C.
Clarke J.
6-36-1
Grenier H.[4]
Kopriva V.
6-12-66-4
Vesely J.[1]
Bellier A.
6-36-726-2
Vukic A.[3]
Kubler J.
7-56-4
Purcell M.
Ramanathan R.
3-66-07-5
Muller A.
Travaglia S.[2]
6-17-62
Couacaud E.[6]
Reddy R.
6-16-3
Coppejans K.
Polmans M.
1-66-26-4
Ilkel C.
Diez S.
6-26-3