Borna Gojo vs Alexandre Muller — Bengaluru 1 CH Semi-final

Bengaluru 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
Alexandre Muller
FRA
Alexandre Muller
#132ATP
1665ELO
1630Hard ELO
$426kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Gojo B.
4-6 6-3 6-0
Muller A.
Gojo B.
4662
Muller A.
6301

Borna Gojo defeated Alexandre Muller 4-6 6-3 6-0 in the Bengaluru 1 CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexandre Muller came in ranked #132.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Muller A.

Muller A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gojo B.Muller A.
—
Serve
11
—
Return
13

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Muller A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Muller A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
75
Break points saved·Even
95
94
Break points won·Dominant
10
44
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
73
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Muller A.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.1+32 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Hard Elo 1630
4.7Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1665
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
2.7
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Muller A.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Muller A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Couacaud E.[6]
7-56-4
Gojo B.
Muller A.
4-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[6]
Vesely J.[1]
6-40-0
Muller A.
Ilkel C.
6-47-67
Tseng C.
Decamps G.
6-46-4
Gojo B.
Coppejans K.
7-56-4
R16
Couacaud E.[6]
Purcell M.
6-43-66-2
Muller A.
Kuzmanov D.
7-646-4
Decamps G.
Moroni G.
6-25-77-63
Tseng C.
Grenier H.[4]
6-16-4
Vesely J.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
3-66-26-1
Coppejans K.
Celikbilek A.[5]
7-6126-3
Ilkel C.
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-5
Gojo B.
Vukic A.[3]
7-56-3
R32
Decamps G.
Gaio F.[8]
6-36-3
Gunneswaran P.
Bourgue M.
7-646-2
Kuzmanov D.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Jaziri M.
7-6106-4
Gojo B.
Noguchi R.
3-66-16-2
Celikbilek A.[5]
Kadhe A.
6-16-2
Moroni G.
Myneni S.
6-16-1
Tseng C.
Clarke J.
6-36-1
Grenier H.[4]
Kopriva V.
6-12-66-4
Vesely J.[1]
Bellier A.
6-36-726-2
Vukic A.[3]
Kubler J.
7-56-4
Purcell M.
Ramanathan R.
3-66-07-5
Muller A.
Travaglia S.[2]
6-17-62
Couacaud E.[6]
Reddy R.
6-16-3
Coppejans K.
Polmans M.
1-66-26-4
Ilkel C.
Diez S.
6-26-3