Jonas Forejtek vs Filip Horansky — Cherbourg CH Round of 32

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#312ATP
1387ELO
1333Hard ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
SVK
Filip Horansky
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Forejtek J.
4-6 6-1 6-4
Horansky F.
Forejtek J.
4662
Horansky F.
6141

Jonas Forejtek defeated Filip Horansky 4-6 6-1 6-4 in the Cherbourg CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jonas Forejtek came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Forejtek J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Horansky F.

Horansky F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Serve advantage — Forejtek J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Forejtek J.Horansky F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Forejtek J.Horansky F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
29
Break points saved·Dominant
78
34
Break points won·Dominant
6
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
7
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Forejtek J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Horansky F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
4.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.4
9.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-42-66-4
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.
Gulbis E.
6-746-46-4
Bonzi B.[1]
Bergs Z.
4-67-56-1
Quarter-finals
Gulbis E.
Herbert P.[2]
7-52-66-4
Lestienne C.
Van Assche L.
6-36-726-1
Bergs Z.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Draper J.
7-666-2
R16
Lestienne C.
Kukushkin M.
7-56-3
Bergs Z.
Novak D.[4]
7-56-2
Bonzi B.[1]
De Schepper K.
6-37-64
Gulbis E.
Simon G.[5]
6-32-66-3
Herbert P.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-36-4
Bemelmans R.
Halys Q.[6]
7-635-76-3
Draper J.
Marterer M.
6-46-2
Van Assche L.
Lamasine T.
3-67-644-1
R32
De Schepper K.
Marie J.
4-64-0
Lamasine T.
Pouille L.[8]
6-40-0
Halys Q.[6]
Mayot H.
6-47-62
Bemelmans R.
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Novak D.[4]
Elias G.
6-26-1
Marterer M.
Safiullin R.[7]
6-33-67-5
Draper J.
Barrere G.
6-41-66-3
Forejtek J.
Horansky F.
4-66-16-4
Bonzi B.[1]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Hoang A.
7-57-63
Bergs Z.
Pellegrino A.
7-646-4
Herbert P.[2]
Zuk K.
6-27-64
Simon G.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-656-4
Kukushkin M.
Machac T.[3]
6-36-2
Gulbis E.
Added D.
6-46-4
Lestienne C.
Safwat M.
1-67-636-1