Jack Draper vs Maximilian Marterer — Cherbourg CH Round of 16

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
GER
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Draper J.
6-4 6-2
Marterer M.
Draper J.
662
Marterer M.
420

Jack Draper defeated Maximilian Marterer 6-4 6-2 in the Cherbourg CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jack Draper came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jack Draper extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-11-06SofiaR32hardJack Draper6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Marterer M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Marterer M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.1
5.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Marterer M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
93
Break points won·Dominant
83
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marterer M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Marterer M.
Freshness·
100
—

Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-42-66-4
Semi-finals
Lestienne C.
Gulbis E.
6-746-46-4
Bonzi B.[1]
Bergs Z.
4-67-56-1
Quarter-finals
Gulbis E.
Herbert P.[2]
7-52-66-4
Lestienne C.
Van Assche L.
6-36-726-1
Bergs Z.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Draper J.
7-666-2
R16
Lestienne C.
Kukushkin M.
7-56-3
Bergs Z.
Novak D.[4]
7-56-2
Bonzi B.[1]
De Schepper K.
6-37-64
Gulbis E.
Simon G.[5]
6-32-66-3
Herbert P.[2]
Forejtek J.
6-36-4
Bemelmans R.
Halys Q.[6]
7-635-76-3
Draper J.
Marterer M.
6-46-2
Van Assche L.
Lamasine T.
3-67-644-1
R32
De Schepper K.
Marie J.
4-64-0
Lamasine T.
Pouille L.[8]
6-40-0
Halys Q.[6]
Mayot H.
6-47-62
Bemelmans R.
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Novak D.[4]
Elias G.
6-26-1
Marterer M.
Safiullin R.[7]
6-33-67-5
Draper J.
Barrere G.
6-41-66-3
Forejtek J.
Horansky F.
4-66-16-4
Bonzi B.[1]
Rosenkranz M.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Hoang A.
7-57-63
Bergs Z.
Pellegrino A.
7-646-4
Herbert P.[2]
Zuk K.
6-27-64
Simon G.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-656-4
Kukushkin M.
Machac T.[3]
6-36-2
Gulbis E.
Added D.
6-46-4
Lestienne C.
Safwat M.
1-67-636-1