Gabriel Decamps vs Federico Gaio — Bengaluru 1 CH Round of 32

Bengaluru 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BRA
Gabriel Decamps
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
ITA8
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Decamps G.
6-3 6-3
Gaio F.
Decamps G.
662
Gaio F.
330

Gabriel Decamps defeated Federico Gaio 6-3 6-3 in the Bengaluru 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Decamps G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Gaio F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Decamps G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Decamps G.Gaio F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Decamps G.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Gaio F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.1
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Couacaud E.[6]
7-56-4
Gojo B.
Muller A.
4-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[6]
Vesely J.[1]
6-40-0
Muller A.
Ilkel C.
6-47-67
Tseng C.
Decamps G.
6-46-4
Gojo B.
Coppejans K.
7-56-4
R16
Couacaud E.[6]
Purcell M.
6-43-66-2
Muller A.
Kuzmanov D.
7-646-4
Decamps G.
Moroni G.
6-25-77-63
Tseng C.
Grenier H.[4]
6-16-4
Vesely J.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
3-66-26-1
Coppejans K.
Celikbilek A.[5]
7-6126-3
Ilkel C.
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-5
Gojo B.
Vukic A.[3]
7-56-3
R32
Decamps G.
Gaio F.[8]
6-36-3
Gunneswaran P.
Bourgue M.
7-646-2
Kuzmanov D.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Jaziri M.
7-6106-4
Gojo B.
Noguchi R.
3-66-16-2
Celikbilek A.[5]
Kadhe A.
6-16-2
Moroni G.
Myneni S.
6-16-1
Tseng C.
Clarke J.
6-36-1
Grenier H.[4]
Kopriva V.
6-12-66-4
Vesely J.[1]
Bellier A.
6-36-726-2
Vukic A.[3]
Kubler J.
7-56-4
Purcell M.
Ramanathan R.
3-66-07-5
Muller A.
Travaglia S.[2]
6-17-62
Couacaud E.[6]
Reddy R.
6-16-3
Coppejans K.
Polmans M.
1-66-26-4
Ilkel C.
Diez S.
6-26-3