Kimmer Coppejans vs Marc Polmans — Bengaluru 1 CH Round of 32

Bengaluru 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1469Hard ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 February 2022
hard
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
Coppejans K.
1-6 6-2 6-4
Polmans M.
Coppejans K.
1662
Polmans M.
6241

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Marc Polmans 1-6 6-2 6-4 in the Bengaluru 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Polmans M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Polmans M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 182). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Polmans M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
79
Break points won·Clear edge
29
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
31
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
43
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Polmans M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+55 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1414
6.1Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1449
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
8.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Polmans M.
Freshness·Dominant
72
100

Coppejans K.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Polmans M.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Tseng C.
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Couacaud E.[6]
7-56-4
Gojo B.
Muller A.
4-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[6]
Vesely J.[1]
6-40-0
Muller A.
Ilkel C.
6-47-67
Tseng C.
Decamps G.
6-46-4
Gojo B.
Coppejans K.
7-56-4
R16
Couacaud E.[6]
Purcell M.
6-43-66-2
Muller A.
Kuzmanov D.
7-646-4
Decamps G.
Moroni G.
6-25-77-63
Tseng C.
Grenier H.[4]
6-16-4
Vesely J.[1]
Gunneswaran P.
3-66-26-1
Coppejans K.
Celikbilek A.[5]
7-6126-3
Ilkel C.
Donskoy E.
2-66-37-5
Gojo B.
Vukic A.[3]
7-56-3
R32
Decamps G.
Gaio F.[8]
6-36-3
Gunneswaran P.
Bourgue M.
7-646-2
Kuzmanov D.
Dev S.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Jaziri M.
7-6106-4
Gojo B.
Noguchi R.
3-66-16-2
Celikbilek A.[5]
Kadhe A.
6-16-2
Moroni G.
Myneni S.
6-16-1
Tseng C.
Clarke J.
6-36-1
Grenier H.[4]
Kopriva V.
6-12-66-4
Vesely J.[1]
Bellier A.
6-36-726-2
Vukic A.[3]
Kubler J.
7-56-4
Purcell M.
Ramanathan R.
3-66-07-5
Muller A.
Travaglia S.[2]
6-17-62
Couacaud E.[6]
Reddy R.
6-16-3
Coppejans K.
Polmans M.
1-66-26-4
Ilkel C.
Diez S.
6-26-3