Tennys Sandgren vs Christian Harrison — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA1
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 January 2022
hard
USA
Christian Harrison
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWWL
Sandgren T.
7-6 3-6 7-6
Harrison C.
Sandgren T.
773772
Harrison C.
656631

Tennys Sandgren defeated Christian Harrison 7-6 3-6 7-6 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tennys Sandgren closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Harrison C.

Harrison C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Harrison C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Harrison C.
Clutch Rating·Even
36
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
78
Break points won·Dominant
2
33
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
49
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Harrison C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.
Nishioka Y.[3]
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Stricker D.
Mmoh M.
3-66-37-62
Nishioka Y.[3]
Fabbiano T.
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
Galarneau A.
6-736-36-0
Stricker D.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-37-64
Nishioka Y.[3]
Blumberg W.
3-66-46-2
Fabbiano T.
Stebe C.
6-16-3
R16
Blumberg W.
Gomez E.[7]
6-13-1
Mmoh M.
Sock J.[8]
6-12-1
Fabbiano T.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-66-46-1
Escobedo E.[6]
Kuhn N.
6-767-54-0
Stricker D.
Nava E.
3-66-36-4
Galarneau A.
Broady L.[4]
6-17-5
Nishioka Y.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-41-66-4
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-53-66-1
R32
Stricker D.
Seppi A.[2]
6-46-4
Nava E.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-757-65
Kuhn N.
Fratangelo B.
7-686-4
Escobedo E.[6]
Smith K.
7-636-4
Broady L.[4]
Wolf J.
6-46-1
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Harrison C.
7-653-67-63
Stebe C.
Torpegaard M.
4-66-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Hijikata R.
7-646-3
Galarneau A.
Blanch U.
7-657-63
Sock J.[8]
Schnur B.
2-66-46-3
Gomez E.[7]
Jung J.
6-36-4
Blumberg W.
Quiroz R.
6-46-776-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Nishioka Y.[3]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Fabbiano T.
Krueger M.
7-56-3