Emilio Gomez vs Jason Jung — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU7
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 January 2022
hard
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Gomez E.
6-3 6-4
Jung J.
Gomez E.
662
Jung J.
340

Emilio Gomez defeated Jason Jung 6-3 6-4 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Gomez came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Gomez closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Serve advantage — Jung J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Jung J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 121). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
64
Break points won·Slight edge
19
8
Deciding sets·Even
23
21
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jung J.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.7
Surface form
3.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
1.4
Minutes 14d
8.1
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez E.Jung J.
Freshness·
—
78

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.
Nishioka Y.[3]
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Stricker D.
Mmoh M.
3-66-37-62
Nishioka Y.[3]
Fabbiano T.
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
Galarneau A.
6-736-36-0
Stricker D.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-37-64
Nishioka Y.[3]
Blumberg W.
3-66-46-2
Fabbiano T.
Stebe C.
6-16-3
R16
Blumberg W.
Gomez E.[7]
6-13-1
Mmoh M.
Sock J.[8]
6-12-1
Fabbiano T.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-66-46-1
Escobedo E.[6]
Kuhn N.
6-767-54-0
Stricker D.
Nava E.
3-66-36-4
Galarneau A.
Broady L.[4]
6-17-5
Nishioka Y.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-41-66-4
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-53-66-1
R32
Stricker D.
Seppi A.[2]
6-46-4
Nava E.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-757-65
Kuhn N.
Fratangelo B.
7-686-4
Escobedo E.[6]
Smith K.
7-636-4
Broady L.[4]
Wolf J.
6-46-1
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Harrison C.
7-653-67-63
Stebe C.
Torpegaard M.
4-66-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Hijikata R.
7-646-3
Galarneau A.
Blanch U.
7-657-63
Sock J.[8]
Schnur B.
2-66-46-3
Gomez E.[7]
Jung J.
6-36-4
Blumberg W.
Quiroz R.
6-46-776-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Nishioka Y.[3]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Fabbiano T.
Krueger M.
7-56-3