Michael Mmoh vs Alexis Galarneau — Cleveland CH Quarter-final

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 January 2022
hard
Alexis Galarneau
CAN
Alexis Galarneau
#158ATP
1593ELO
1548Hard ELO
$166kYTD
$825kCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWWL
Mmoh M.
6-7 6-3 6-0
Galarneau A.
Mmoh M.
63662
Galarneau A.
77301

Michael Mmoh defeated Alexis Galarneau 6-7 6-3 6-0 in the Cleveland CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexis Galarneau came in ranked #158, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Galarneau A.

Galarneau A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Galarneau A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Galarneau A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
79
Break points won·Clear edge
31
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
22
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
61

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Galarneau A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+51 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1548
5.4Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1593
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
4.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Galarneau A.
Freshness·Dominant
95
59

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Galarneau A.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.
Nishioka Y.[3]
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Stricker D.
Mmoh M.
3-66-37-62
Nishioka Y.[3]
Fabbiano T.
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
Galarneau A.
6-736-36-0
Stricker D.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-37-64
Nishioka Y.[3]
Blumberg W.
3-66-46-2
Fabbiano T.
Stebe C.
6-16-3
R16
Blumberg W.
Gomez E.[7]
6-13-1
Mmoh M.
Sock J.[8]
6-12-1
Fabbiano T.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-66-46-1
Escobedo E.[6]
Kuhn N.
6-767-54-0
Stricker D.
Nava E.
3-66-36-4
Galarneau A.
Broady L.[4]
6-17-5
Nishioka Y.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-41-66-4
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-53-66-1
R32
Stricker D.
Seppi A.[2]
6-46-4
Nava E.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-757-65
Kuhn N.
Fratangelo B.
7-686-4
Escobedo E.[6]
Smith K.
7-636-4
Broady L.[4]
Wolf J.
6-46-1
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Harrison C.
7-653-67-63
Stebe C.
Torpegaard M.
4-66-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Hijikata R.
7-646-3
Galarneau A.
Blanch U.
7-657-63
Sock J.[8]
Schnur B.
2-66-46-3
Gomez E.[7]
Jung J.
6-36-4
Blumberg W.
Quiroz R.
6-46-776-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Nishioka Y.[3]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Fabbiano T.
Krueger M.
7-56-3