Thomas Fabbiano vs Tennys Sandgren — Cleveland CH Round of 16

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 January 2022
hard
USA1
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Fabbiano T.
3-6 6-4 6-1
Sandgren T.
Fabbiano T.
3662
Sandgren T.
6411

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Tennys Sandgren 3-6 6-4 6-1 in the Cleveland CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.1
8.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
92
Break points won·Clear edge
16
2
Deciding sets·Even
28
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fabbiano T.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Sandgren T.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
2.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.
Nishioka Y.[3]
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Stricker D.
Mmoh M.
3-66-37-62
Nishioka Y.[3]
Fabbiano T.
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
Galarneau A.
6-736-36-0
Stricker D.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-37-64
Nishioka Y.[3]
Blumberg W.
3-66-46-2
Fabbiano T.
Stebe C.
6-16-3
R16
Blumberg W.
Gomez E.[7]
6-13-1
Mmoh M.
Sock J.[8]
6-12-1
Fabbiano T.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-66-46-1
Escobedo E.[6]
Kuhn N.
6-767-54-0
Stricker D.
Nava E.
3-66-36-4
Galarneau A.
Broady L.[4]
6-17-5
Nishioka Y.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-41-66-4
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-53-66-1
R32
Stricker D.
Seppi A.[2]
6-46-4
Nava E.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-757-65
Kuhn N.
Fratangelo B.
7-686-4
Escobedo E.[6]
Smith K.
7-636-4
Broady L.[4]
Wolf J.
6-46-1
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Harrison C.
7-653-67-63
Stebe C.
Torpegaard M.
4-66-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Hijikata R.
7-646-3
Galarneau A.
Blanch U.
7-657-63
Sock J.[8]
Schnur B.
2-66-46-3
Gomez E.[7]
Jung J.
6-36-4
Blumberg W.
Quiroz R.
6-46-776-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Nishioka Y.[3]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Fabbiano T.
Krueger M.
7-56-3