Thomas Fabbiano vs Tennys Sandgren — Cleveland CH Round of 16
Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 January 2022
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
6.4
Surface form2.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d8.6
7.0
3-set count7.0
6.0
Prev. match7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Fabbiano T.
3662
Sandgren T.
6411
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form67%1st serve in+8%59%
62%1st serve points won+15%77%
49%2nd serve points won+2%51%
58%Service points won+9%67%
33%Return points won+3%36%
57%Break points saved+10%67%
1.5Aces / match+9.511
3.1Double faults / match+0.13
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (8 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Stricker D.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-37-64
Nishioka Y.[3]
Blumberg W.
3-66-46-2
Fabbiano T.
Stebe C.
6-16-3
Mmoh M.
Galarneau A.
6-736-36-0
R16
Fabbiano T.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-66-46-1
Blumberg W.
Gomez E.[7]
6-13-1
Escobedo E.[6]
Kuhn N.
6-767-54-0
Stricker D.
Nava E.
3-66-36-4
Nishioka Y.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-41-66-4
Mmoh M.
Sock J.[8]
6-12-1
Galarneau A.
Broady L.[4]
6-17-5
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-53-66-1
R32
Sock J.[8]
Schnur B.
2-66-46-3
Kuhn N.
Fratangelo B.
7-686-4
Stricker D.
Seppi A.[2]
6-46-4
Sandgren T.[1]
Harrison C.
7-653-67-63
Blumberg W.
Quiroz R.
6-46-776-4
Stebe C.
Torpegaard M.
4-66-46-2
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Nava E.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-757-65
Galarneau A.
Blanch U.
7-657-63
Nishioka Y.[3]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Broady L.[4]
Wolf J.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[6]
Smith K.
7-636-4
Fabbiano T.
Krueger M.
7-56-3
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Hijikata R.
7-646-3
Gomez E.[7]
Jung J.
6-36-4