William Blumberg vs Roberto Quiroz — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
William Blumberg
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 January 2022
hard
ECU
Roberto Quiroz
34 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
Blumberg W.
6-4 6-7 6-4
Quiroz R.
Blumberg W.
66762
Quiroz R.
47941

William Blumberg defeated Roberto Quiroz 6-4 6-7 6-4 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Roberto Quiroz came in defending last year's round of 32, but William Blumberg had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 5 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: William Blumberg edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blumberg W.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Quiroz R.

Quiroz R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Blumberg W.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blumberg W.Quiroz R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
55%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.5
4.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (11 vs 53). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blumberg W.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 196 days (−1.5)
Quiroz R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.
Nishioka Y.[3]
7-56-1
Semi-finals
Stricker D.
Mmoh M.
3-66-37-62
Nishioka Y.[3]
Fabbiano T.
7-666-3
Quarter-finals
Mmoh M.
Galarneau A.
6-736-36-0
Stricker D.
Escobedo E.[6]
6-37-64
Nishioka Y.[3]
Blumberg W.
3-66-46-2
Fabbiano T.
Stebe C.
6-16-3
R16
Blumberg W.
Gomez E.[7]
6-13-1
Mmoh M.
Sock J.[8]
6-12-1
Fabbiano T.
Sandgren T.[1]
3-66-46-1
Escobedo E.[6]
Kuhn N.
6-767-54-0
Stricker D.
Nava E.
3-66-36-4
Galarneau A.
Broady L.[4]
6-17-5
Nishioka Y.[3]
Uchiyama Y.
6-41-66-4
Stebe C.
Rodionov J.[5]
7-53-66-1
R32
Stricker D.
Seppi A.[2]
6-46-4
Nava E.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-757-65
Kuhn N.
Fratangelo B.
7-686-4
Escobedo E.[6]
Smith K.
7-636-4
Broady L.[4]
Wolf J.
6-46-1
Mmoh M.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Harrison C.
7-653-67-63
Stebe C.
Torpegaard M.
4-66-46-2
Rodionov J.[5]
Hijikata R.
7-646-3
Galarneau A.
Blanch U.
7-657-63
Sock J.[8]
Schnur B.
2-66-46-3
Gomez E.[7]
Jung J.
6-36-4
Blumberg W.
Quiroz R.
6-46-776-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Nishioka Y.[3]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Fabbiano T.
Krueger M.
7-56-3