Vasek Pospisil vs Lukas Lacko — Quimper CH Round of 16

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CAN5
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 January 2022
hard
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Pospisil V.
6-4 6-3
Lacko L.
Pospisil V.
662
Lacko L.
430

Vasek Pospisil defeated Lukas Lacko 6-4 6-3 in the Quimper CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Vasek Pospisil came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Vasek Pospisil extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-08-27US OpenR128hardVasek Pospisil7-5 6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve advantage — Pospisil V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
43%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
58%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Clear edge
65%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.5
5.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
86
Break points won·Even
7
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil V.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lacko L.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
2.4
Minutes 14d
8.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[5]
Barrere G.
6-43-66-1
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.[5]
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Barrere G.
Novak D.[3]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-636-4
Novak D.[3]
Sousa J.[6]
6-37-66
Barrere G.
Kuznetsov A.
6-36-3
Moriya H.
Muller A.
6-27-5
R16
Novak D.[3]
Furness E.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Tsonga J.
6-24-66-4
Moriya H.
Bemelmans R.
7-56-1
Pospisil V.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-3
Sousa J.[6]
Lestienne C.
6-32-66-3
Barrere G.
Pouille L.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Zuk K.
7-56-4
Kuznetsov A.
Dzumhur D.
7-656-2
R32
Muller A.
Herbert P.[2]
6-46-3
Moriya H.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-1
Dzumhur D.
Laaksonen H.[1]
6-46-3
Lacko L.
Moraing M.
6-37-5
Tsonga J.
Huesler M.
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-34-66-4
Kuznetsov A.
Van Assche L.
7-656-2
Zuk K.
Simon G.[4]
7-654-66-3
Lestienne C.
Arnaboldi A.
6-33-0
Bemelmans R.
Safiullin R.[8]
7-676-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Hoang A.
7-626-3
Sousa J.[6]
Agamenone F.
6-36-3
Furness E.
Horansky F.
6-26-3
Novak D.[3]
Bergs Z.
6-42-66-4
Barrere G.
Lehecka J.[7]
6-26-3
Pouille L.
Janvier M.
6-36-1