Tim Van Rijthoven vs Filip Cristian Jianu — Quimper CH Qualifying Round 2

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
NED4
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 January 2022
hard
Filip Cristian Jianu
ROU11
Filip Cristian Jianu
#282ATP
1387ELO
1305Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Van Rijthoven T.
6-4 6-4
Jianu F.
Van Rijthoven T.
662
Jianu F.
440

Tim Van Rijthoven defeated Filip Cristian Jianu 6-4 6-4 in the Quimper CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tim Van Rijthoven edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Rijthoven T.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Jianu F.

Jianu F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Rijthoven T.Jianu F.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
77%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 192). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Rijthoven T.Jianu F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
16
Break points saved·Dominant
90
55
Break points won·Dominant
1
52
Deciding sets·Slight edge
19
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
61
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Rijthoven T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jianu F.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
1.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Furness E.[6]
Martineau M.[12]
4-66-26-3
Mochizuki S.
Moeller M.
6-32-67-5
Kuznetsov A.[5]
Forejtek J.[9]
6-46-3
Muller A.[1]
Vrbensky M.
6-36-3
Van Rijthoven T.[4]
Jianu F.[11]
6-46-4
Moriya H.[7]
Arnaboldi A.[3]
6-25-76-4
Q1
Jianu F.[11]
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Mochizuki S.
Lamasine T.[8]
6-36-3
Kuznetsov A.[5]
Pel D.
6-46-4
Vrbensky M.
Jacquet K.[10]
3-67-606-3
Moeller M.
Arends S.
6-36-0
Furness E.[6]
Deschamps T.
6-37-66
Muller A.[1]
Legout T.
7-56-1
Martineau M.[12]
Vatutin A.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.[9]
Briand J.
6-16-0
Van Rijthoven T.[4]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-57-64
Moriya H.[7]
Tabur C.
6-16-1
Arnaboldi A.[3]
Kravchenko G.
6-36-3