Tim Van Rijthoven vs Antoine Hoang — Quimper CH Round of 32

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 January 2022
hard
FRA
Antoine Hoang
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Van Rijthoven T.
7-6 6-3
Hoang A.
Van Rijthoven T.
7762
Hoang A.
6230

Tim Van Rijthoven defeated Antoine Hoang 7-6 6-3 in the Quimper CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Rijthoven T.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Hoang A.

Hoang A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Rijthoven T.Hoang A.
1st serve in·Even
66%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Even
33%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
3.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Rijthoven T.Hoang A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
18
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
81
Break points won·Clear edge
1
15
Deciding sets·Clear edge
19
5
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
61
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Rijthoven T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hoang A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
1.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
6.7
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[5]
Barrere G.
6-43-66-1
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.[5]
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Barrere G.
Novak D.[3]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-636-4
Novak D.[3]
Sousa J.[6]
6-37-66
Barrere G.
Kuznetsov A.
6-36-3
Moriya H.
Muller A.
6-27-5
R16
Novak D.[3]
Furness E.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Tsonga J.
6-24-66-4
Moriya H.
Bemelmans R.
7-56-1
Pospisil V.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-3
Sousa J.[6]
Lestienne C.
6-32-66-3
Barrere G.
Pouille L.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Zuk K.
7-56-4
Kuznetsov A.
Dzumhur D.
7-656-2
R32
Muller A.
Herbert P.[2]
6-46-3
Moriya H.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-1
Dzumhur D.
Laaksonen H.[1]
6-46-3
Lacko L.
Moraing M.
6-37-5
Tsonga J.
Huesler M.
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-34-66-4
Kuznetsov A.
Van Assche L.
7-656-2
Zuk K.
Simon G.[4]
7-654-66-3
Lestienne C.
Arnaboldi A.
6-33-0
Bemelmans R.
Safiullin R.[8]
7-676-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Hoang A.
7-626-3
Sousa J.[6]
Agamenone F.
6-36-3
Furness E.
Horansky F.
6-26-3
Novak D.[3]
Bergs Z.
6-42-66-4
Barrere G.
Lehecka J.[7]
6-26-3
Pouille L.
Janvier M.
6-36-1