Nick Hardt vs Emilio Nava — Columbus CH Qualifying Round 2

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Nick Hardt
DOM9
Nick Hardt
#275ATP
1473ELO
1414Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 January 2022
hard
Emilio Nava
USA6
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Hardt N.
6-2 4-6 6-0
Nava E.
Hardt N.
6462
Nava E.
2601

Nick Hardt defeated Emilio Nava 6-2 4-6 6-0 in the Columbus CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hardt N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Hardt N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Hardt N.Nava E.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Hardt N.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hardt N.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
52
Break points saved·Dominant
33
94
Break points won·Clear edge
32
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hardt N.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Nava E.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hardt N.Nava E.
Freshness·Clear edge
83
100

Hardt N.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 57 games (7d) · Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Hardt N.[9]
Nava E.[6]
6-24-66-0
Mejia N.
Galarneau A.
3-67-667-65
Fanselow S.[8]
Polansky P.[4]
6-36-3
Watanuki Y.[3]
Rybakov A.[10]
7-647-66
Harrison R.
Young D.
3-66-16-3
Quiroz R.
Kamke T.[1]
6-747-666-1
Cash R.
Glinka D.[12]
3-67-676-4
Kypson P.[7]
Young D.[6]
4-66-06-4
Ponwith N.[3]
Anthrop J.
3-66-46-4
Trotter J.
Kirchheimer S.[2]
6-26-0
Nakagawa N.[1]
Smith R.[8]
3-66-36-4
Q1
Fanselow S.[8]
Svajda Z.
2-66-46-4
Galarneau A.
Kovacevic A.[11]
6-14-67-63
Polansky P.[4]
Aragone J.
6-36-3
Mejia N.
Chappell N.
7-52-66-1
Nava E.[6]
Cozbinov A.
3-66-27-65
Rybakov A.[10]
Nanda G.
5-76-26-4
Harrison R.
Pervolarakis M.[12]
7-56-1
Young D.
Uchida K.[2]
6-37-67
Quiroz R.
Harrison C.[7]
6-47-65
Kamke T.[1]
Smith K.
6-46-1
Cash R.
Mcnally J.[5]
6-46-4
Kypson P.[7]
Saar K.
6-36-3
Young D.[6]
Brown P.
6-45-77-5
Glinka D.[12]
Stearns P.
7-56-3
Anthrop J.
Bernard A.[10]
6-37-5
Trotter J.
Frantzen C.
6-06-2