Nick Hardt vs Ryan Harrison — Columbus CH Round of 32
Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 January 2022
hard
Hardt N.6-4 7-6
Harrison R.
Hardt N.
6772
Harrison R.
4630
Nick Hardt defeated Ryan Harrison 6-4 7-6 in the Columbus CH round of 32 on hard.
Key context
- Match story: Nick Hardt edged Ryan Harrison in two tight sets (6–4 7–6).
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.8
3.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 34). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
26
46
Break points saved·Dominant
33
93
Break points won·Clear edge
32
16
Deciding sets·Slight edge
55
65
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
48
41
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Umpiry Score
Pre-match3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited- Extended break: 154 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
3.4
Surface form2.6
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·
83
—
Hardt N.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-36-4
Stricker D.
Rodionov J.[4]
6-42-66-4
Thompson J.[1]
Kingsley C.
7-666-3
Gomez E.[2]
Hijikata R.[8]
3-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Gomez E.[6]
6-14-66-3
Brooksby J.[1]
Escobedo E.[5]
6-41-66-1
Stricker D.
Sock J.[7]
W/O
Rodionov J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-717-54-3
Hijikata R.[8]
Stricker D.[3]
4-67-676-3
Kingsley C.
Vukic A.[4]
6-36-2
Thompson J.[1]
Diallo G.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
R16
Nishioka Y.[3]
Wolf J.
6-22-66-4
Stricker D.
Kozlov S.
4-66-46-3
Torpegaard M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-16-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Blanch U.
7-686-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Istomin D.
7-56-1
Sock J.[7]
Soeda G.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Hardt N.
6-36-2
Gomez E.[6]
Kuhn N.
7-667-5
Gomez E.[2]
Sandgren T.
3-66-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Lock B.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[8]
Boulais J.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Jubb P.[7]
7-646-4
Diallo G.
Mchugh A.
7-56-767-5
Thompson J.[1]
Mukund S.
6-36-3
Chappell N.
Couacaud E.[5]
6-46-716-4
Vukic A.[4]
Nakagawa N.
7-53-67-62
R32
Kozlov S.
Bernard A.
6-26-1
Soeda G.
Wu T.
7-656-2
Rodionov J.[4]
Schnur B.
6-45-77-5
Hardt N.
Harrison R.
6-47-63
Torpegaard M.
Mmoh M.
6-47-63
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-2
Gomez E.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
7-57-5
Kuhn N.
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
7-676-4
Istomin D.
Fanselow S.
7-51-66-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Krueger M.
2-66-37-5
Wolf J.
Anthrop J.
6-06-3
Sock J.[7]
Eubanks C.
7-676-746-4
Nishioka Y.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-46-4
Stricker D.
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-737-60
Gomez E.[2]
Cash R.
6-36-2
Chappell N.
Galarneau A.
1-66-16-3
Stricker D.[3]
Kypson P.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Tracy J.
7-57-64
Hijikata R.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-16-4
Jubb P.[7]
Harrison R.
7-666-4
Nakagawa N.
Clark E.
7-56-2
Diallo G.
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Lock B.
Zhu E.
3-66-17-67
Sandgren T.
Kumar O.
7-56-2
Vukic A.[4]
Cox D.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Broom C.
7-656-2
Mchugh A.
Koepfer D.[6]
3-67-647-67