Yoshihito Nishioka vs Emilio Gomez — Columbus CH Quarter-final

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Yoshihito Nishioka
JPN3
Yoshihito Nishioka
#177ATP
1689ELO
1659Hard ELO
$42kYTD
$7.5MCAREER
30 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 January 2022
hard
ECU6
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Nishioka Y.
6-1 4-6 6-3
Gomez E.
Nishioka Y.
6462
Gomez E.
1631

Yoshihito Nishioka defeated Emilio Gomez 6-1 4-6 6-3 in the Columbus CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Yoshihito Nishioka came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Yoshihito Nishioka extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Yoshihito Nishioka came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-03-21Miami MastersR128hardYoshihito Nishioka6-2 6-7(2) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Nishioka Y.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nishioka Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nishioka Y.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.5
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nishioka Y.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
84
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
77
Break points won·Dominant
59
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nishioka Y.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
5.8
0.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.[3]
Stricker D.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[1]
Gomez E.[2]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-36-4
Stricker D.
Rodionov J.[4]
6-42-66-4
Thompson J.[1]
Kingsley C.
7-666-3
Gomez E.[2]
Hijikata R.[8]
3-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Gomez E.[6]
6-14-66-3
Brooksby J.[1]
Escobedo E.[5]
6-41-66-1
Stricker D.
Sock J.[7]
W/O
Rodionov J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-717-54-3
Hijikata R.[8]
Stricker D.[3]
4-67-676-3
Kingsley C.
Vukic A.[4]
6-36-2
Thompson J.[1]
Diallo G.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
R16
Nishioka Y.[3]
Wolf J.
6-22-66-4
Stricker D.
Kozlov S.
4-66-46-3
Torpegaard M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-16-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Blanch U.
7-686-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Istomin D.
7-56-1
Sock J.[7]
Soeda G.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Hardt N.
6-36-2
Gomez E.[6]
Kuhn N.
7-667-5
Gomez E.[2]
Sandgren T.
3-66-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Lock B.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[8]
Boulais J.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Jubb P.[7]
7-646-4
Diallo G.
Mchugh A.
7-56-767-5
Thompson J.[1]
Mukund S.
6-36-3
Chappell N.
Couacaud E.[5]
6-46-716-4
Vukic A.[4]
Nakagawa N.
7-53-67-62
R32
Kozlov S.
Bernard A.
6-26-1
Soeda G.
Wu T.
7-656-2
Rodionov J.[4]
Schnur B.
6-45-77-5
Hardt N.
Harrison R.
6-47-63
Torpegaard M.
Mmoh M.
6-47-63
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-2
Gomez E.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
7-57-5
Kuhn N.
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
7-676-4
Istomin D.
Fanselow S.
7-51-66-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Krueger M.
2-66-37-5
Wolf J.
Anthrop J.
6-06-3
Sock J.[7]
Eubanks C.
7-676-746-4
Nishioka Y.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-46-4
Stricker D.
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-737-60
Gomez E.[2]
Cash R.
6-36-2
Chappell N.
Galarneau A.
1-66-16-3
Stricker D.[3]
Kypson P.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Tracy J.
7-57-64
Hijikata R.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-16-4
Jubb P.[7]
Harrison R.
7-666-4
Nakagawa N.
Clark E.
7-56-2
Diallo G.
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Lock B.
Zhu E.
3-66-17-67
Sandgren T.
Kumar O.
7-56-2
Vukic A.[4]
Cox D.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Broom C.
7-656-2
Mchugh A.
Koepfer D.[6]
3-67-647-67