Emilio Gomez vs Nicola Kuhn — Columbus CH Round of 16

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ECU6
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 January 2022
hard
GER
Nicola Kuhn
#1540ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Gomez E.
7-6 7-5
Kuhn N.
Gomez E.
7872
Kuhn N.
6650

Emilio Gomez defeated Nicola Kuhn 7-6 7-5 in the Columbus CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Gomez came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Emilio Gomez extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenQ1hardEmilio Gomez6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kuhn N.

Kuhn N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Kuhn N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
54%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 50). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Kuhn N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
56
Break points won·Even
19
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
23
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kuhn N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.3
Surface form
2.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
9.1
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.[3]
Stricker D.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[1]
Gomez E.[2]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-36-4
Stricker D.
Rodionov J.[4]
6-42-66-4
Thompson J.[1]
Kingsley C.
7-666-3
Gomez E.[2]
Hijikata R.[8]
3-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Gomez E.[6]
6-14-66-3
Brooksby J.[1]
Escobedo E.[5]
6-41-66-1
Stricker D.
Sock J.[7]
W/O
Rodionov J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-717-54-3
Hijikata R.[8]
Stricker D.[3]
4-67-676-3
Kingsley C.
Vukic A.[4]
6-36-2
Thompson J.[1]
Diallo G.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
R16
Nishioka Y.[3]
Wolf J.
6-22-66-4
Stricker D.
Kozlov S.
4-66-46-3
Torpegaard M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-16-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Blanch U.
7-686-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Istomin D.
7-56-1
Sock J.[7]
Soeda G.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Hardt N.
6-36-2
Gomez E.[6]
Kuhn N.
7-667-5
Gomez E.[2]
Sandgren T.
3-66-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Lock B.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[8]
Boulais J.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Jubb P.[7]
7-646-4
Diallo G.
Mchugh A.
7-56-767-5
Thompson J.[1]
Mukund S.
6-36-3
Chappell N.
Couacaud E.[5]
6-46-716-4
Vukic A.[4]
Nakagawa N.
7-53-67-62
R32
Kozlov S.
Bernard A.
6-26-1
Soeda G.
Wu T.
7-656-2
Rodionov J.[4]
Schnur B.
6-45-77-5
Hardt N.
Harrison R.
6-47-63
Torpegaard M.
Mmoh M.
6-47-63
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-2
Gomez E.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
7-57-5
Kuhn N.
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
7-676-4
Istomin D.
Fanselow S.
7-51-66-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Krueger M.
2-66-37-5
Wolf J.
Anthrop J.
6-06-3
Sock J.[7]
Eubanks C.
7-676-746-4
Nishioka Y.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-46-4
Stricker D.
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-737-60
Gomez E.[2]
Cash R.
6-36-2
Chappell N.
Galarneau A.
1-66-16-3
Stricker D.[3]
Kypson P.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Tracy J.
7-57-64
Hijikata R.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-16-4
Jubb P.[7]
Harrison R.
7-666-4
Nakagawa N.
Clark E.
7-56-2
Diallo G.
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Lock B.
Zhu E.
3-66-17-67
Sandgren T.
Kumar O.
7-56-2
Vukic A.[4]
Cox D.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Broom C.
7-656-2
Mchugh A.
Koepfer D.[6]
3-67-647-67