Dennis Novak vs Zizou Bergs — Quimper CH Round of 32

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUT3
Dennis Novak
#818ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 January 2022
hard
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
Novak D.
6-4 2-6 6-4
Bergs Z.
Novak D.
6262
Bergs Z.
4641

Dennis Novak defeated Zizou Bergs 6-4 2-6 6-4 in the Quimper CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35.

Key context

  • Match story: Dennis Novak closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Novak D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Bergs Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Novak D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Novak D.Bergs Z.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
40

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Novak D.Bergs Z.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Novak D.Bergs Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
69
Break points saved·Clear edge
80
95
Break points won·Slight edge
15
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Novak D.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 57 days (−0.7)
Bergs Z.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
3.4
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Novak D.Bergs Z.
Freshness·
—
82

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Pospisil V.[5]
Barrere G.
6-43-66-1
Semi-finals
Pospisil V.[5]
Moriya H.
6-26-3
Barrere G.
Novak D.[3]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Pospisil V.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
7-636-4
Novak D.[3]
Sousa J.[6]
6-37-66
Barrere G.
Kuznetsov A.
6-36-3
Moriya H.
Muller A.
6-27-5
R16
Novak D.[3]
Furness E.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Tsonga J.
6-24-66-4
Moriya H.
Bemelmans R.
7-56-1
Pospisil V.[5]
Lacko L.
6-46-3
Sousa J.[6]
Lestienne C.
6-32-66-3
Barrere G.
Pouille L.
6-46-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Zuk K.
7-56-4
Kuznetsov A.
Dzumhur D.
7-656-2
R32
Muller A.
Herbert P.[2]
6-46-3
Moriya H.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-1
Dzumhur D.
Laaksonen H.[1]
6-46-3
Lacko L.
Moraing M.
6-37-5
Tsonga J.
Huesler M.
6-46-3
Pospisil V.[5]
Bourgue M.
6-34-66-4
Kuznetsov A.
Van Assche L.
7-656-2
Zuk K.
Simon G.[4]
7-654-66-3
Lestienne C.
Arnaboldi A.
6-33-0
Bemelmans R.
Safiullin R.[8]
7-676-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Hoang A.
7-626-3
Sousa J.[6]
Agamenone F.
6-36-3
Furness E.
Horansky F.
6-26-3
Novak D.[3]
Bergs Z.
6-42-66-4
Barrere G.
Lehecka J.[7]
6-26-3
Pouille L.
Janvier M.
6-36-1