Tomas Machac vs Jesper De JongAustralian Open Qualifying Final

Australian Open · ATP · Qualifying Final
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 January 2022
hard
#73ATP
1711ELO
1607Hard ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
Machac T.
6-2 6-3
De Jong J.
Machac T.
662
De Jong J.
230

Tomas Machac defeated Jesper De Jong 6-2 6-3 in the Australian Open qualifying final on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Tomas Machac extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

10
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-06-16HalleR32grassTomas Machac7-5 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

De Jong J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.De Jong J.
30
Serve
23
25
Return
17

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
5.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
56
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
90
Break points won·Dominant
80
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+222 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Hard Elo 1607
7.7Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1711
10.0
H2H
0.0
9.3
Surface form
5.3
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
6.4
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·
92

De Jong J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 68%
Q1
Dzumhur D.[30]
Tu L.
6-16-3
Trungelliti M.
Lacko L.
6-36-4
Tabilo A.[16]
Mccabe J.
7-653-66-3
Lehecka J.[18]
Mmoh M.
6-36-4
Milojevic N.[15]
Kicker N.
6-45-76-2
Marterer M.
Serdarusic N.
3-66-16-4
Couacaud E.
Ilkel C.[21]
6-36-746-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Sela D.
6-36-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Soeda G.
2-67-656-2
Olivo R.
Fratangelo B.
6-26-4
Winter E.
Simon G.[4]
6-31-66-3
Elias G.
Gulbis E.
6-756-23-1
Machac T.[20]
Ugo Carabelli C.
2-66-36-1
Ficovich J.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-4
Escobedo E.
Celikbilek A.[32]
6-46-4
Halys Q.[26]
Mayot H.
6-46-1
Kamke T.
Gaio F.[28]
6-46-2
Broady L.[10]
Zuk K.
4-66-16-2
Sousa J.[17]
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[19]
Collarini A.
7-676-2
Rodionov J.[14]
Janvier M.
7-636-4
Cobolli F.
Harris A.
7-634-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Seyboth Wild T.[13]
6-777-53-1
Bhambri Y.
Domingues J.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.[31]
Schoolkate T.
6-36-4
Krueger M.
Blanch U.
6-16-2
Kopriva V.
Agamenone F.
4-67-636-3
De Jong J.
Santillan A.
5-76-46-3
Sweeny D.
Barrere G.
7-56-3
Popko D.
Zapata Miralles B.[6]
6-17-5
Skatov T.
Grenier H.[25]
6-36-2
Cachin P.
Cerundolo F.[9]
6-756-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Mena F.
6-46-3
Hanfmann Y.[8]
Jung J.
6-757-56-0
Barrios Vera T.[22]
Muller A.
6-37-5
Giannessi A.
Huesler M.
6-43-66-3
Etcheverry T.[12]
Coppejans K.
2-66-46-1
Polmans M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-636-2
Lestienne C.
Pellegrino A.
2-66-16-2
Stricker D.
Safwat M.
3-66-26-1
Hijikata R.
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Gombos N.[2]
Kuznetsov A.
7-56-746-2
Gomez E.[23]
Kuhn N.
6-46-4
Horansky F.
Torpegaard M.
1-0
Moroni G.
Ramanathan R.
6-37-5
Caruso S.[29]
Rola B.
3-66-17-65
Sachko V.
Bergs Z.
3-67-652-3
Daniel T.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
6-36-3
Ebden M.
Moraing M.[27]
4-66-26-1
Purcell M.
Donskoy E.
6-46-2
Safiullin R.
Tomic B.
6-16-4
Kukushkin M.
Basic M.
6-26-3
Gunneswaran P.
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
Sekulic P.
Bachinger M.
6-46-3
Tirante T.
Schnur B.
6-41-66-4
Albot R.[5]
Baldi F.
7-666-2
Wolf J.
Stakhovsky S.
6-36-4
Vavassori A.
Bemelmans R.
6-27-66
Kubler J.
Giustino L.
3-66-46-0
Ymer E.
Kovalik J.[24]
7-636-2
Varillas J.[11]
Uchiyama Y.
7-57-66
Haase R.
Martin A.[1]
6-04-67-5
Watanuki Y.
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-1
Kuzmanov D.
Masur D.
4-66-37-65