Quentin Halys vs Cedrik Marcel Stebe — Forli 3 CH Semi-final

Forli 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Quentin Halys
FRA2
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 January 2022
hard
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Halys Q.
6-7 6-2 6-4
Stebe C.
Halys Q.
66662
Stebe C.
78241

Quentin Halys defeated Cedrik Marcel Stebe 6-7 6-2 6-4 in the Forli 3 CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Stebe C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Stebe C.
35
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Stebe C.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Stebe C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
57
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
75
Break points won·Slight edge
4
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
91
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Stebe C.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.8+154 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1523
6.6Overall Elo 1707
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1556
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
4.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Stebe C.
Freshness·
92
—

Halys Q.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kotov P.
Halys Q.[2]
7-56-756-3
Semi-finals
Halys Q.[2]
Stebe C.
6-766-26-4
Kotov P.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Stebe C.
Agamenone F.
7-57-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Pospisil V.[1]
7-636-717-5
Kotov P.
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Halys Q.[2]
Moroni G.
7-617-62
R16
Moroni G.
Wu T.
7-686-3
Agamenone F.
Uchida K.
6-26-4
Stebe C.
Clarke J.
6-36-3
Kotov P.
Masur D.[7]
6-26-0
Ferreira Silva F.
Pellegrino A.
4-67-657-65
Halys Q.[2]
Guinard M.
5-76-16-2
Pospisil V.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-36-4
Rosol L.
Gojo B.
6-46-746-4
R32
Guinard M.
Tiurnev E.
6-756-46-3
Wu T.
Zuk K.[6]
4-66-37-5
Uchida K.
Celikbilek A.[4]
6-34-67-64
Stebe C.
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Clarke J.
Barrere G.[5]
6-46-746-2
Masur D.[7]
Arnaboldi A.
7-633-66-4
Kotov P.
Istomin D.
6-46-4
Gojo B.
Draper J.
7-636-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Arnaldi M.
6-36-3
Napolitano S.
Serdarusic N.
7-662-67-62
Agamenone F.
Copil M.
6-23-66-3
Moroni G.
Hoang A.
6-746-06-2
Pospisil V.[1]
Furness E.
6-46-3
Rosol L.
Ilkel C.[3]
6-47-67
Pellegrino A.
Lacko L.[8]
0-66-37-60
Halys Q.[2]
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-1